cool! Thanks, Michael
Am 06.06.24 um 08:56 schrieb Balog Tamás:
Dear Lucene Community,
Since Tuesday, the IntelliJ plugin called
[Lucas](https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/24567-lucas) is available on the
JetBrains Marketplace.
It integrates / ports the Luke toolbox to the IntelliJ
Neat!
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024, 2:57 AM Balog Tamás
wrote:
> Dear Lucene Community,
> Since Tuesday, the IntelliJ plugin called [Lucas](
> https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/24567-lucas) is available on the
> JetBrains Marketplace.
>
> It integrates / ports the Luke toolb
Dear Lucene Community,
Since Tuesday, the IntelliJ plugin called
[Lucas](https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/24567-lucas) is available on the
JetBrains Marketplace.
It integrates / ports the Luke toolbox to the IntelliJ Platform, and with some
differences, it provides the same GUI and feature
Hi Experts,
I am in a project of migration of Lucene from 2.4.1 to 8.11.2 for our product.
I am seeing some difference in search result of my written code Vs. Luke Tool
result on same Index files.
Can anybody please explain, what can be the reason behind it?
I explaining more in details below
t; own github account and check there how things go.
> The Apache License permits you to do this as long as you reference that
> Luke and Lucene are developed by the Apache Software Foundation.
>
> Btw, I just got your plugin running and it is very cool, that I can now
> run Luke within
long as you reference that
Luke and Lucene are developed by the Apache Software Foundation.
Btw, I just got your plugin running and it is very cool, that I can now
run Luke within IntelliJ :-) thank you for making a demo version available!
Thanks
Michael
Am 16.11.23 um 10:40 schrieb
Hi Balog,
as I mentioned, in my opinion it's extremely unlikely that such a project
(Intellij Luke Plugin) could be considered to be incubated.
Luke itself is an auxiliary tool for an Apache project and it has been
contributed to Apache Lucene so the most natural place I would see your
pr
re than 90% the same as Luke's, as
I simply reused its source code, so that I don't have to reimplement
everything.)
AFAIK Luke is also using Apache License 2.0, so you should not have a
licensing issue re Luke itself at least
@Michael: I built the plugin .zip file. It is ab
contribute it as a Lucene
> module (most likely, like it happened with Luke) or a separate project
> (unlikely to deserve a separate one as Luke has been donated itself to
> Lucene).
> This won't happen automatically, you'll need to a Lucene
>
> committer it's g
Hi Balog,
first of all, thanks, I think it's a cool idea!
In regards to giving it to the Apache Software Foundation, it works as a
donation:
you assign a permissive license (Apache) and contribute it as a Lucene
module (most likely, like it happened with Luke) or a separate project
(unlike
hanks
Michael
Am 13.11.23 um 10:07 schrieb Balog Tamás:
Hello everyone!
I've been working on a proof of concept of creating an IntelliJ plugin from the
Luke application and it reached a demoable state.
If anyone of the Lucene core maintainers, team leads, etc. is interested, I
chner
írta:
> Hi Tamas
>
> Can one download your plugin somewhere to test it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> Am 13.11.23 um 10:07 schrieb Balog Tamás:
>
> > Hello everyone!
> >
> > I've been working on a proof of concept of c
Hi Tamas
Can one download your plugin somewhere to test it?
Thanks
Michael
Am 13.11.23 um 10:07 schrieb Balog Tamás:
Hello everyone!
I've been working on a proof of concept of creating an IntelliJ plugin from the
Luke application and it reached a demoable state.
If anyone of the L
Hello everyone!
I've been working on a proof of concept of creating an IntelliJ plugin from the
Luke application and it reached a demoable state.
If anyone of the Lucene core maintainers, team leads, etc. is interested, I'd
be glad to demonstrate it and discuss a potential futu
Hi,
Luke 8.0.0 is out.
Zip archive can be downloaded from here:
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/luke-swing-8.0.0
In this release,
- Lucene version was upgraded to 8.0.0.
- Added 'exact hits count' checkbox to the Search tab to return the
accurate total hit count.
-
Hi,
Luke 7.7.0 is out.
Zip archive can be downloaded at here:
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/luke-swing-7.7.0
In this release,
- Lucene version was upgraded to 7.7.0.
- Some trivial UI bugs were fixed.
Regards,
Tomoko
Hi Luke users,
Luke 7.6.0 was just released.
Zip archive can be downloaded from here:
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/luke-swing-7.6.0
This release includes important bug fixes and improvements. Please consider
upgrading if you use Swing Luke 7.5.0.
Major changes: https
(Sorry, if here is not a suitable place for such a 'call for volunteers'
announcement...)
Luke project now happily enjoys a large user base :)
At the same time, it is still run by minimum development resources (like
many other active OSS projects, I know.)
To keep Luke up-to-date (at
Hi,
Luke 7.5.0 was just released.
For this release, we have two editions of Luke. (Sorry for the confusion.)
* Luke 7.5.0 - Swing edition
Swing edition can be downloaded from here:
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/luke-swing-7.5.0
This version of Luke works with JDK 8/9/10/11.
Use
Download the release zip from here:
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/luke-7.4.0
This update is for upgrading Lucene 7.4.0.
Note: If you use OpenJDK you need to install OpenJFX separately to run
JavaFX. Oracle HotSpot JVM includes JavaFX runtime.
Best,
Tomoko Uchida
Download the release zip here:
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/luke-7.3.1
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDmitryKey%2Fluke%2Freleases%2Ftag%2Fluke-7.3.1&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNEhWcfB-7OfASv_ZaEludUA3B1InQ>
- Upgrade to Lucene 7.3.1.
- UI
Download the release zip here:
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/luke-7.2.0
Upgrade to Lucene 7.2.0.
And, revised Luke atop JavaFX can be downloaded here:
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/luke-javafx-7.2.0
Luke atop JavaFX is distributed under Apache License v2.
We
Download the release zip here:
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/luke-7.1.0
Upgrade to Lucene 7.1.0.
and, other changes in this release:
<https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/blob/master/CHANGES.txt>
--
Tomoko Uchida
Download the release zip here:
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/luke-6.5.0
Also, tested with Lucene 6.5.1.
#86 <https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/pull/86>
and, other changes in this release:
<https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/blob/luke-6.5.0/CHANGES.txt>
Thanks t
axsearch/marple <https://github.com/flaxsearch/marple>.
>> Very much a project in development, but more testers and contributors are
>> always welcome!
>>
>> Alan Woodward
>> www.flax.co.uk
>>
>>
>>> On 10 Nov 2016, at 13:23, Chri
is Bamford wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I recently heard about an alternative (API?) to Luke for examining indexes.
>>
>> Can someone please point me to it?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> -
Nov 2016, at 13:23, Chris Bamford wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I recently heard about an alternative (API?) to Luke for examining indexes.
>
> Can someone please point me to it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Chris
>
>
Hi
I recently heard about an alternative (API?) to Luke for examining indexes.
Can someone please point me to it?
Thanks
Chris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Hello.
I want to set LMJelinekMercer Similarity (with lambda set to, say, 0.6) for
the Luke similarity calculation. Luke by default use the DefaultSimilarity.
Can anyone help with this? I use Lucene 4.10.4 and Luke for that version
of Lucene index.
Dwaipayan..
Thx again. I'll try NLP4L anyway ;)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tomoko Uchida [mailto:tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 27. April 2015 11:13
An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Luke for Lucene 5.x?
Hi,
Currently Luke is not the part of Lucene, you should
Hi,
Currently Luke is not the part of Lucene, you should check Luke project in
Github.
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke
Here is the Issue for lucene 5.
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/issues/21
I'm now trying to make Luke support Lucene 5.x in my local branch.
Pull requests from
I'll give it a try. Any plans for luke to support Lucene 5.x, too?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Koji Sekiguchi [mailto:koji.sekigu...@rondhuit.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 24. April 2015 08:23
An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Luke for Lucene 5.x?
Hi Clemens,
NLP4L,
time to time I make use of luke to inspect lucene indexes. I appreciate
this tool very much.
Will there be a version of Luke for Lucene 5.x? Or is there one already?
Thx
Clemens
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr
From time to time I make use of luke to inspect lucene indexes. I appreciate
this tool very much.
Will there be a version of Luke for Lucene 5.x? Or is there one already?
Thx
Clemens
human readable character that you can manually type. E.g. if your
application's facets don't use the character '/' in the hierarchy, you can
use it. You should then be able to search for $facets:A/B from Luke, but
make sure $facets field is not analyzed during search, as well
Hi all,
I think somebody already did this question in the mailing list, but I
can't find it.
Is possible to execute a search with facets in luke? then use the
$facets field in searches?
Nicola.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
If anybody is using Lucene 4.2 and wants a version of Luke that supports it
I've got a version that supports 4.2 on my Github (
https://github.com/mpoindexter/luke). This tarball should have all the
source and binaries:
https://github.com/mpoindexter/luke/archive/4.2-1.tar.gz
I've als
Great to read this, there is hope!
And Luke definitely deserves to be a Lucene module.
Wouter
> If anyone is able to donate some effort, a nice future scenario could be
> that Luke comes fully up to date with every Lucene release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2562
&
If anyone is able to donate some effort, a nice future scenario could be that
Luke comes fully up to date with every Lucene release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2562
- Mark
On Mar 15, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
> For the record, I happily use Luke (with Lucene
For the record, I happily use Luke (with Lucene 4.1) compiled from
https://github.com/sonarme/luke. It is also mavenized (shipped with a
pom.xml).
Thx, Eric
On 14/03/2013 09:10, dizh wrote:
OK , tomorrow I will put it on spmewhere such as GitHub or googlecode.
But, I really don't look
OK , Thank you !
Anyone saw my last question ? Lucene Pagination
Look for a deepy answer.
---
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
accompanying attachment(s)
is in
DocValues is the main problem in 4.2/Luke.
For 4.1 there is a working Luke on github:
https://github.com/mingfai/luke
Wouter
> I compile 4.1
>
> 4.2 change a lot ??
>
> I really think Luke should be in control of Lucene
I compile 4.1
4.2 change a lot ??
I really think Luke should be in control of Lucene developer teams.
---
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
accompanying
So judging from the (lack of) response so far it seems Luke development
has stopped (last update on Google code is from August 2012) and it is now
up to anyone to adopt te code.
And... Luke / Lucene 4.2 is not just a matter of recompile.
Wouter
> Am 13.03.2013 10:23, schrieb dizh:
>&g
OK , tomorrow I will put it on spmewhere such as GitHub or googlecode.
But, I really don't look into details, when I compile Luke src , I found about
ten's errors.
Most are TermEnums API , so I
Am 13.03.2013 10:23, schrieb dizh:
> I just recompile it.
>
> Luckily, It doesn't need to do much work. Only a few modifications according
> to Lucene4.1 API change doc.
That's great news. Are you going to publish a ready-made version somewhere?
Also, I've made the
I just recompile it.
Luckily, It doesn't need to do much work. Only a few modifications according to
Lucene4.1 API change doc.
---
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and a
Anybody knows what is happening to Luke?
Staying with the latest Lucene has become a risk since Luke seems to stay
behind of the Lucene development.
For 4.1 it was possible to find a patch on github, for 4.2 DocValues are
broken in Luke.
Wouter
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce the release of Luke - The Lucene Index Toolbox for
Lucene 4.0.0-ALPHA. Standalone binary and sources are available as usual
from:
http://code.google.com/p/luke
Changes in v. 4.0-ALPHA (released on 2012.
I sent this message to the Luke discussion forum, but there isn't a lot of
activity there these days, so I thought I would ask my question here too.
I was asked if Luke supports highlighting of matched terms in its search
results display. I looked through the code, and it doesn't
;I'm happy to announce the release of Luke - The Lucene Index Toolbox,
>>version 3.5.0. This release includes Lucene 3.5.0 libraries, and you can
>>download it from:
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/luke
>>
>>Changes in version 3.5.0 (released o
great!!
At 2011-12-29 04:29:33,"Andrzej Bialecki" wrote:
>Hi Lucene users,
>
>I'm happy to announce the release of Luke - The Lucene Index Toolbox,
>version 3.5.0. This release includes Lucene 3.5.0 libraries, and you can
>download it from:
>
> http://
Hi Lucene users,
I'm happy to announce the release of Luke - The Lucene Index Toolbox,
version 3.5.0. This release includes Lucene 3.5.0 libraries, and you can
download it from:
http://code.google.com/p/luke
Changes in version 3.5.0 (released on 2011.12.28):
* Update to Lucene
er is
new LimitTokenCountAnalyzer(new
SmartChineseAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_32,Stopwords),Integer.MAX_VALUE)
Hi
We are now trying to inspect the index in Luke 3.4.0 (have chosen the UTF-8 option in
Luke), but it seems to be garbled. We see a lot of "???". According to
http://code.goog
alyzer(new
SmartChineseAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_32,Stopwords),Integer.MAX_VALUE)
Hi
We are now trying to inspect the index in Luke 3.4.0 (have chosen the UTF-8
option in Luke), but it seems to be garbled. We see a lot of "???". According
to
http://code.google.com/p/luke/source/browse/trunk/src/org/
-Original Message-
> From: Peyman Faratin [mailto:pey...@robustlinks.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 6:11 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: inspecting chinese index using luke
>
> hi
>
> We are indexing some chinese text (using the following outp
hi
We are indexing some chinese text (using the following outputstreamwriter with
UTF-8 enconding).
OutputStreamWriter outputFileWriter = new OutputStreamWriter(new
FileOutputStream(outputFile), "utf8");
We are trying to inspect the index in Luke 3.4.0 (have chosen the UTF-8 optio
Yes I tried this. I update (delete & add) my document now with a small program
through Lucene directly so I don't rely on Luke anymore here.
Thanks to everyone who tried to help.
Michael
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Gesendet:
a.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011 11:06
> An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: [OT] editing index with Luke question
>
> Hope you have write permission on this index file
>
> Vinaya
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Südkamp [mailto
sure
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Vinaya Kumar Thimmappa [mailto:vthimma...@ariba.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011 11:06
An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: RE: [OT] editing index with Luke question
Hope you have write permission on this index file
Vinaya
Hope you have write permission on this index file
Vinaya
-Original Message-
From: Michael Südkamp [mailto:michael.suedk...@docware.de]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 3:16 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [OT] editing index with Luke question
Hi,
I know the Luke tool
Hi,
I know the Luke tool for browsing a Lucene index. From the description and the
GUI I think it's also possible to edit index. But I have problems with that
and I wonder if someone can help with this.
What I did in Luke 3.4.0_1 is:
- open an index
- search for term -> get a list of
gt; --
> Ian.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:12 AM, ejblom wrote:
> > Dear Lucene-users,
> >
> > I am a bit puzzled over this. I have a query which should return some
> > documents, if I use Luke, I obtain hits using the
> > org.apache.lucene.analysis.Key
6, 2011 at 8:12 AM, ejblom wrote:
> Dear Lucene-users,
>
> I am a bit puzzled over this. I have a query which should return some
> documents, if I use Luke, I obtain hits using the
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.KeywordAnalyzer.
>
> This is the query:
>
> domain:NB-AR*
>
Dear Lucene-users,
I am a bit puzzled over this. I have a query which should return some
documents, if I use Luke, I obtain hits using the
org.apache.lucene.analysis.KeywordAnalyzer.
This is the query:
domain:NB-AR*
(I have data indexed using:
doc.add(new Field("domain&quo
t;> Hi,
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that Luke - The Lucene Index Toolbox for Lucene
>> 3.4.0 is available now for download from the project page:
>>
>>http://code.google.com/p/luke
>>
>> Changes in version 3.4.0 (released on 2011.10.03):
>> * I
thanks so much.I am going to upgrade the lucene to version3.4 in my
project.I'll try the new version luke.thanks for hard-work
On 2011-10-3 17:52, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Hi,
I'm happy to announce that Luke - The Lucene Index Toolbox for Lucene
3.4.0 is available now for downloa
Look at the bright side Andrzej. Enough people have come to rely
on this nifty program that someone is bound to try it out right away!
Erick
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 16:09, Mihai Caraman wrote:
>>
>> same on win7 and ubuntu11.
>>
>> 2011/10/3 Erick
Works for me too now. Thanks for the quick turnaround !
Shai
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 16:09, Mihai Caraman wrote:
>
>> same on win7 and ubuntu11.
>>
>> 2011/10/3 Erick Erickson
>> >
>>
>> Same thing happened to me on a Mac, Java 1.6
>>>
>>
> *sigh
Works, it can open the tax Index too, ty!
2011/10/3 Andrzej Bialecki
> On 03/10/2011 16:09, Mihai Caraman wrote:
>
>> same on win7 and ubuntu11.
>>
>> 2011/10/3 Erick Erickson
>> >
>>
>> Same thing happened to me on a Mac, Java 1.6
>>>
>>
> *sigh* this was supposed to be an innocent correction
On 03/10/2011 16:09, Mihai Caraman wrote:
same on win7 and ubuntu11.
2011/10/3 Erick Erickson
Same thing happened to me on a Mac, Java 1.6
*sigh* this was supposed to be an innocent correction of a column width,
but somehow a stray TAB ended up in a wrong place. There's probably some
lesso
ke.main(Unknown Source)
> >
> > I use Windows 7, tried with Java 5 & 6 (Oracle and IBM) and get the same
> > results. This is the command I used to run with previous versions (and it
> > works w/ 3.30 for example) - has it changed?
> >
> > Shai
> >
t.luke.Luke.startLuke(Unknown Source)
> at org.getopt.luke.Luke.main(Unknown Source)
>
> I use Windows 7, tried with Java 5 & 6 (Oracle and IBM) and get the same
> results. This is the command I used to run with previous versions (and it
> works w/ 3.30 for example) - has it ch
versions (and it
works w/ 3.30 for example) - has it changed?
Shai
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm happy to announce that Luke - The Lucene Index Toolbox for Lucene 3.4.0
> is available now for download from the project page:
>
>
Hi,
I'm happy to announce that Luke - The Lucene Index Toolbox for Lucene
3.4.0 is available now for download from the project page:
http://code.google.com/p/luke
Changes in version 3.4.0 (released on 2011.10.03):
* Issue 46: and 47: Update to Lucene 3.4.0 and fix some changed
Hi all,
Luke 3.3.0 has been released and is available for download here:
http://code.google.com/p/luke/
Apart from the updated Lucene libraries there were no changes in
functionality.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki
Hi,
I'm happy to announce the release of Luke 3.1.0. This release is based
on Lucene 3.1.0. Binaries and source code are available from the
project's page at Google Code:
http://code.google.com/p/luke/
Changes in version 3.1.0 (released on 2011.04.30):
* Issue 35: Lucene 3.1
nal Message-
> From: Patrick Diviacco [mailto:patrick.divia...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 9:03 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene, Luke: unknown format version: -12
>
> argh, yeah exactly.
>
> There is no way to inspect the index
argh, yeah exactly.
There is no way to inspect the index without luke ?
Or to use luke with Lucene 4.0 ?
thanks
On 23 March 2011 09:01, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You are using a Lucene version that is not yet released (maybe 3.x branch
> or
> trunk). This seems to be n
Hi,
You are using a Lucene version that is not yet released (maybe 3.x branch or
trunk). This seems to be not supported by the used Luke version.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: P
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce the release of Luke - the Lucene Index Toolbox.
You can get an executable self-contained jar here:
http://luke.googlecode.com/files/lukeall-1.0.1.jar
The Downloads section contains also the source code and a minimal
Luke-only jar.
This release upgrades to L
>>The lack of standardized metadata is an issue, of course - we could
start experimenting with this in Luke, to see whether we can squeeze a
subset of Solr schema there.
Actually, an "AnalyzerFactory" interface in Luke might provide the abstraction
which would allow Solr, my prop
On 2010-03-05 11:22, mark harwood wrote:
I'll commit the current mostly-working state today, you can take a look
OK. However I think this XMLQueryParser addition will only resurface a
long-standing issue with Luke and Lucene in general.
This query parser works best on multiple fields
>>I'll commit the current mostly-working state today, you can take a look
OK. However I think this XMLQueryParser addition will only resurface a
long-standing issue with Luke and Lucene in general.
This query parser works best on multiple fields (e.g. free-text
tags and on struct
textarea.
I'll commit the current mostly-working state today, you can take a look
- you've written some cool Luke plugins before .. ;)
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Informa
>>No, this simply means that you will be able to use the xml-query-parser
>>instead of the regular one
Not sure exactly what you have in mind for an editor, Andrzej but there is an
opportunity to do something smart here for little effort.
The XMLQueryParser comes with a DTD which means you ca
On 2010-03-04 17:56, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Andrzej,
Does that mean the regular Lucene QP will get Span query syntax support (vs.
having it in that separate Surround QP)? Or maybe that already happened and I
missed it? :)
I wish that were the case ;)
No, this simply means that you will be
://search-hadoop.com/
- Original Message
> From: Andrzej Bialecki
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 10:22:49 AM
> Subject: Re: SpanQueries in Luke
>
> On 2010-03-04 14:13, Rene Hackl-Sommer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like
ubmit SpanQueries in Luke. AFAIK this isn't doable out
of the box.
What would be the way to go? Replace the built-in QueryParser by e.g.
the xml-query-parser from the contrib section?
The upcoming Luke 1.0.1 will support this parser out of the box. I
expect to make a release within a few days. Watch t
On 2010-03-04 14:13, Rene Hackl-Sommer wrote:
Hi,
I would like to submit SpanQueries in Luke. AFAIK this isn't doable out
of the box.
What would be the way to go? Replace the built-in QueryParser by e.g.
the xml-query-parser from the contrib section?
The upcoming Luke 1.0.1 will support
Hi,
I would like to submit SpanQueries in Luke. AFAIK this isn't doable out
of the box.
What would be the way to go? Replace the built-in QueryParser by e.g.
the xml-query-parser from the contrib section?
Thanks,
On 2009-12-26 15:34, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
Cool! The only thing I found that is not working is the analysis tool,
because no analyzer in lucene has a zero-arg ctor anymore. So you should use
reflection to find a one-arg ctor with o.a.l.util.Version and use it
preferably and if not exi
27;ll open an issue.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:a...@getopt.org]
> Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 2:51 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>
Hard working boy:-)
Merry Christmas too~
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm happy to announce that Luke 1.0.0 was released, and is available for
> download here:
>
>http://code.google.com/p/luke
>
> This version
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce that Luke 1.0.0 was released, and is available for
download here:
http://code.google.com/p/luke
This version of Luke uses Lucene 3.0 jars. There were only minor changes
in the code (and none in functionality) related to the changes in API
be
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce a new release of Luke - the Lucene Index Toolbox.
Please note that Luke development has moved to Google Code, and the
downloads are available from the following page:
http://code.google.com/p/luke/
In addition, all other parts of the Google
: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 10:43 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Distinct terms values? (like in Luke)
>
> > @Test
> > public void distin
> @Test
> public void distinct() throws Exception {
> RAMDirectory directory = new RAMDirectory();
> IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(directory, new
> WhitespaceAnalyzer(), true, IndexWriter.MaxFieldLength.UNLIMITED);
>
> for (int l = -2; l <= 2; l++) {
>
n enumeration of all terms starting with the given one (the field
> name). Just iterate over the TermEnum util the field name of the iterated
> term changes.
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
&
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Because I like to have Luke always sitting at hand, I have packed this
release as a MacOSX disk-image and applcation.
http://www.activemath.org/~paul/tmp/Luke-0.9.9.dmg
The icon could be better (I need a hires of Lucene's icon, haven't found
it yet).
P
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
