>From an API standpoint, I envision you would supply a rectangular region of
interest and some means of specifying the resolution. It could be the
so-called “grid level” in lucene spatial (1 is biggest most coarsest,
larger numbers yield progressively smaller cells), or it might be expressed
in te
Thanks, David. In the meantime, care to share any thoughts about your planned
implementation?
On Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:11 AM, "david.w.smi...@gmail.com"
wrote:
FYI I plan to implement this in Lucene-spatial & Solr in January.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Co
FYI I plan to implement this in Lucene-spatial & Solr in January.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Shahak Nagiel
wrote:
> I need a way to perform a spatial aggregation query against a
Hi,
If you would index additional grid ids for the bins, you could facet on them.
To me, Elasticsearch's Aggregation Module may also be a good fit.
Uwe
Am 6. November 2014 04:52:10 MEZ, schrieb Shahak Nagiel
:
>I need a way to perform a spatial aggregation query against a
>potentially large do
I need a way to perform a spatial aggregation query against a potentially large
document store in order to display summary clusters on a map. The query would
slice the current map extents (e.g. -180,-90,180,90) into a number of X and Y
bins (e.g. 20 x 16) and, for each, seek a summary count, so
