Re: Lucene performance: benchmarktemplate.xml

2008-04-18 Thread Glen Newton
HI Anshum, A reasonable question. Answer: 64 bit architecture running 64 bit Java VM. It is great! :-) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0_02-b05, mixed mode) > OS Version: Linux OpenSUSE 10.2 (64-bit X86-64) If you have any other questions, please let me know. :-) -Glen On 18/0

Re: Lucene performance: benchmarktemplate.xml

2008-04-17 Thread Anshum
Hi Glenn, I am not too clear about it, but isn't there a limit to the memory consumption specified for the JVM? The limit being 1.3Gigs of resident and 2 Gigs of memory in all? You just mentioned the Memory consumption: -Xms4000m -Xmx6000m. Could someone please help me with the same. -- Anshum O

Re: Lucene performance: benchmarktemplate.xml

2008-04-16 Thread Glen Newton
On 16/04/2008, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These are great results! Thanks for posting. Thanks! > > I'd be curious if you'd get better indexing throughput by using a single > IndexWriter, fed by all 8 indexing threads, with an 8X bigger RAM buffer, > instead of 8 IndexWriter

Re: Lucene performance: benchmarktemplate.xml

2008-04-16 Thread Michael McCandless
These are great results! Thanks for posting. I'd be curious if you'd get better indexing throughput by using a single IndexWriter, fed by all 8 indexing threads, with an 8X bigger RAM buffer, instead of 8 IndexWriters that merge in the end. How long does that final merge take now? Also, 6

Re: Lucene performance: benchmarktemplate.xml

2008-04-16 Thread Glen Newton
Cass, Thanks for converting it. I've posted it to my blog: http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/2008/04/lucene-indexing-performance-benchmarks.html Sorry for the XML tags: I guess I followed the instructions on the Lucene performance benchmarks page to literally ("Post these figures to the lucene-user maili

Re: Lucene performance: benchmarktemplate.xml

2008-04-15 Thread Cass Costello
I just did that so I could read it. :) I'll leave it up until Glen resends or posts it somewhere... http://www.casscostello.com/?page_id=28 On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Glen. > can you resend this in plain text? > or put the HTML up on a server s

Re: Lucene performance: benchmarktemplate.xml

2008-04-15 Thread Ian Holsman
Hi Glen. can you resend this in plain text? or put the HTML up on a server somewhere and point to it with a brief summary in the post? I'd love to look and read it, all those tags are making me go blind. Glen Newton wrote: Hardware Environment Dedicated machine for indexing: yes CPU: D

Lucene performance: benchmarktemplate.xml

2008-04-15 Thread Glen Newton
Hardware Environment Dedicated machine for indexing: yes CPU: Dual processor dual core Xeon CPU 3.00GHz; hyperthreading ON for 8 virtual cores RAM: 8GB Drive configuration: Dell EMC AX150 storage array fibre channel Software environment Lucene Version: 2.3.1 Java Version: Java(TM)

Lucene performance: benchmarktemplate.xml

2008-04-15 Thread Glen Newton
Hardware Environment Dedicated machine for indexing: yes CPU: Dual processor dual core Xeon CPU 3.00GHz; hyperthreading ON for 8 virtual cores RAM: 8GB Drive configuration: Dell EMC AX150 storage array fibre channel Software environment Lucene Version: 2.3.1 Java Versio