Hello All,
Trying to highlight a phrase "John Doe" using Lucene highlighter but the
content highlights each separate term. Contiguous terms are not merged
together.
For eg: JohnDoe is returned instead of John Doe
I have set the mergeContiguous parameter on the getBestTextFragments method
to tru
Hi;
I could find a way to achieve it when I debugged the source code. I've
shared the same information at Solr mail list too. Defining a delimiter and
indexing it as an individual token is the first step. Writing a regex that
"matches" for given delimiter is the next step. Last step is defining th
Hi;
I could not get an answer for my question at Solr list and I wanted to ask
it here because I think that it is more Lucene specific question.
I have indexed my documents and there is a special character sequence that
shows the end of a string. It is:
*|*
For example:
The quick brown fox jum
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the reply.
My Actual Usecase is to Highlight the First occurence of the search word in
the sentence it occured.
In my case,I do not have access to original documents .
Iam looking for optimum way by which i need to reduce the index disk space.
I tried SimpleHighlighter an
On 07/05/2013 01:27 PM, VIGNESH S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think using CompressingStoredFieldsFormat Feature introduced in Lucene
> 4.1 may help reduce index size.
>
> Any other comments and suggestions are welcome in this topic..
>
Do you have access to the original documents, outside Lucene?
If so,
Hi,
I think using CompressingStoredFieldsFormat Feature introduced in Lucene
4.1 may help reduce index size.
Any other comments and suggestions are welcome in this topic..
Thanks and Regards
Vignesh Srinivasan
9739135640
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 6:38 PM, VIGNESH S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it mandat
Hi,
Is it mandatory to use "Store.YES" when using Highlighting Feature.
is it Possible to use Highlighting Feature without using "Store.Yes" while
indexing because it almost doubles index size.
Please Kindly Help.
--
Thanks and Regards
Vignesh Srinivasan
9739135640
(12/04/06 2:34), okayndc wrote:
Hello,
I currently use Lucene version 3.0...probably need to upgrade to a more
current version soon.
The problem that I have is when I test search for a an HTML tag (ex.
), Lucene returns
the highlighted HTML tag ~ which is what I DO NOT want. Is there a way to
"
ripCharFilter should do what you want.
>
> Steve
>
> From: okayndc [mailto:bodymo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 3:36 PM
> To: Steven A Rowe
> Cc: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: HTML tags and Lucene highlighting
>
> Hello,
>
> I
tags (in the field
configured to use HTMLStripCharFilter, anyway).
So HTMLStripCharFilter should do what you want.
Steve
From: okayndc [mailto:bodymo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 3:36 PM
To: Steven A Rowe
Cc: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: HTML tags and Lucene highlig
>
> Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: okayndc [mailto:bodymo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 1:34 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: HTML tags and Lucene highlighting
>
> Hello,
>
> I currently use Lucene version 3.0...probably need to up
Hi okayndc,
What *do* you want?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: okayndc [mailto:bodymo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 1:34 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: HTML tags and Lucene highlighting
Hello,
I currently use Lucene version 3.0...probably need to upgrade
Hello,
I currently use Lucene version 3.0...probably need to upgrade to a more
current version soon.
The problem that I have is when I test search for a an HTML tag (ex.
), Lucene returns
the highlighted HTML tag ~ which is what I DO NOT want. Is there a way to
"filter" HTML tags?
I have read up
Ok. I tried to apply the patch(s) and completely messed it up (user
error). Is there a full example of the highlighter that is available that I
can apply and test?
Cheers
Amin
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Absolutely! I have received considerable help from
Absolutely! I have received considerable help from the community and there
are so many more stuff I want to ask!
Cheers!
Amin
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> Well, it's not yet committed.
>
> You can use it now by pulling the patch a
Well, it's not yet committed.
You can use it now by pulling the patch attached to the issue &
testing it yourself. If you do so, please report back! This is how
Lucene improves.
I'm hoping we can include it in 2.9...
Mike
On Mar 13, 2009, at 6:35 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
Swee
Sweet! When will this highlighter be available? Can I use this now?
Cheers!
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
> I think that would be good.
>>
>
> I'll open an issue.
>
> Probably a silly thing to ask
Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
I think that would be good.
I'll open an issue.
Probably a silly thing to ask but I guess there is a performance
implication by setting it to max value.
Right. And it's tough choosing a default in situations like this --
performance vs losing stuff.
Howe
Hi
I think that would be good. Probably a silly thing to ask but I guess
there is a performance implication by setting it to max value.
Is there a general setting that other developers use?
Cheers
Amin
On 12 Mar 2009, at 22:03, Michael McCandless
wrote:
IndexWriter has such behavi
IndexWriter has such behavior too, and because it was such a common trap
(developers could not understand why their content was being
truncated), we
made that setting explicit, up front so you were aware of it.
I think this in general is a reasonable approach for settings that
"lose" stuff
I did the following:
highlighter.setMaxDocCharsToAnalyze(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
which works.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> JIRA updated. Includes new testcase which shows highlighter not working as
> expected.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Amin Mohammed
JIRA updated. Includes new testcase which shows highlighter not working as
expected.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have found that it is not issue with POI. I extracted text using PoI but
> differenlty and the term is extracted properly. When I store t
Hi
I have found that it is not issue with POI. I extracted text using PoI
but differenlty and the term is extracted properly. When I store the
text and retrieve it the term exists. However running the text through
highlighter doesn't work
I will post test case with plain text file on JIR
t;> The attachment didn't make it through here. Can you add it as an
>> attachment to a new JIRA issue?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Amin Mohammed-Coleman
>> To: java
> From: Amin Mohammed-Coleman
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 12 March, 2009 7:47:20
> Subject: Re: Lucene Highlighting and Dynamic Summaries
>
> Hi
>
> Please find attadched a test case plus a document. Just to mention this
> occurs
The attachment didn't make it through here. Can you add it as an attachment to
a new JIRA issue?
Thanks,
Mark
From: Amin Mohammed-Coleman
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 12 March, 2009 7:47:20
Subject: Re: Lucene Highlighting and Dy
Hi
Please find attadched a test case plus a document. Just to mention this
occurs sometimes for other files.
Cheers
Amin
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, markharw00d wrote:
> If you can supply a Junit test that recreates the problem I think we can
> start to make progress on this.
>
>
>
> Amin
If you can supply a Junit test that recreates the problem I think we can
start to make progress on this.
Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
Hi
Apologies for re sending this mail. Just wondering if anyone has
experienced the below. I'm not sure if this could happen due nature of
document. It does
Hi
Apologies for re sending this mail. Just wondering if anyone has
experienced the below. I'm not sure if this could happen due nature of
document. It does seem strange one term search returns summary while
another does not even though same document is being returned.
I'm asking this so
Hi
I am seeing some strange behaviour with the highlighter and I'm wondering if
anyone else is experiencing this. In certain instances I don't get a
summary being generated. I perform the search and the search returns the
correct document. I can see that the lucene document contains the text in
Hi
Got it working! Thanks again for your help!
Amin
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Thanks! The final piece that I needed to do for the project!
> Cheers
>
> Amin
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
>> > cool. i will use compression an
Thanks! The final piece that I needed to do for the project!
Cheers
Amin
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > cool. i will use compression and store in index. is there anything
> > special
> > i need to for decompressing the text? i presume i can just do
> > doc.get("cont
> cool. i will use compression and store in index. is there anything
> special
> i need to for decompressing the text? i presume i can just do
> doc.get("content")?
> thanks for your advice all!
No just use Field.Store.COMPRESS when adding to index and Document.get()
when fetching. The decompress
turday, March 07, 2009 12:46 PM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Lucene Highlighting and Dynamic Summaries
> >
> > It depends :)
> >
> > It's a trade-off. If storing is not prohibitive, I recommend that as
> > it makes life easier
o: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene Highlighting and Dynamic Summaries
>
> It depends :)
>
> It's a trade-off. If storing is not prohibitive, I recommend that as
> it makes life easier for highlighting.
>
> Erik
>
> On Mar 7, 2009, at
It depends :)
It's a trade-off. If storing is not prohibitive, I recommend that as
it makes life easier for highlighting.
Erik
On Mar 7, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
hi
that's what i was thinking about. i would need to get the file and
extract
the text again a
hi
that's what i was thinking about. i would need to get the file and extract
the text again and then pass through the highlighter. The other option is
storing the content in the index the downside being index is going to be
large. Which would be the recommended approach?
Cheers
Amin
On Sat,
With the caveat that if you're not storing the text you want
highlighted, you'll have to retrieve it somehow and send it into the
Highlighter yourself.
Erik
On Mar 7, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
You should look at contrib/highlighter, which does exactly this.
Mike
You should look at contrib/highlighter, which does exactly this.
Mike
Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
Hi
I am currently indexing documents (pdf, ms word, etc) that are
uploaded,
these documents can be searched and what the search returns to the
user are
summaries of the documents. Currently
Hi
I am currently indexing documents (pdf, ms word, etc) that are uploaded,
these documents can be searched and what the search returns to the user are
summaries of the documents. Currently the summaries are extracted when
indexing the file (summary constructed by taking the first 10 lines of the
From: Matthijs Bierman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/28/2007 5:58 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene highlighting
This would only highlight plaintext though, not in the original document
as I suspect the TS would like.
Matthijs
markharw00d wrote:
>
>> I nee
xml with embedded xhtml
From: Matthijs Bierman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 11/28/2007 3:26 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene highlighting
Hi Scott,
The highlighter code does not do this. You need to implement your own
highlighter
This would only highlight plaintext though, not in the original document
as I suspect the TS would like.
Matthijs
markharw00d wrote:
I need to highlight an entire document as it is displayed
See NullFragmenter
-
To uns
I need to highlight an entire document as it is displayed
See NullFragmenter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Scott,
The highlighter code does not do this. You need to implement your own
highlighter. What kind of documents are you indexing?
Matthijs
Scott Smith wrote:
I've been looking at the highlighter examples. All of them seem to deal with
fragments. I need to highlight an entire document
I've been looking at the highlighter examples. All of them seem to deal with
fragments. I need to highlight an entire document as it is displayed (i.e.,
highlight all of the keywords in it). Can someone point me to some examples of
this or does the highlighter code not do this?
Thanks
Sco
46 matches
Mail list logo
