On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:58 AM, McKinley, James T
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for responding to my message. Are you saying that you or others have
> encountered problems running Lucene 4.8+ on the 64-bit Java SE 1.7 JVM with
> G1 and was it on Windows or on Linux? If so, where can I find
is in order? For example, "we've found that the OpenJDK/Oracle
> 32-bit JVM (if only on Windows, say only on Windows) has a bug that when used
> in combination with the the G1 garbage collector causes incorrect code to be
> produced possibly resulting in index corruption", o
t the OpenJDK/Oracle
> 32-bit JVM (if only on Windows, say only on Windows) has a bug that when used
> in combination with the the G1 garbage collector causes incorrect code to be
> produced possibly resulting in index corruption", or something along those
> lines. It seems a
ng
G1GC with the 64-bit JVM given that it has better performance on large heaps
which are becoming more common today.
FWIW,
Jim
From: McKinley, James T [james.mckin...@cengage.com]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 11:00 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE:
tigate it.
Jim
From: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2015 2:22 PM
To: java-user
Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
The G1C1 issue reference by Robert Muir on the Wiki page is at a
Lucene level. Lucene, of
gt; G1GC has bugs as does CMS but we've found it to work pretty well so far in
>> our runtime system. Of course YMMV, thanks again for the info.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> From: Uwe Schindler [u...@thetaphi.de]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January
yway), G1GC seems to
> work well with Lucene.
>
> Jim
>
> From: Piotr Idzikowski [piotridzikow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 5:35 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4)
work well with
Lucene.
Jim
From: Piotr Idzikowski [piotridzikow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 5:35 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
Hello.
A little bit delay
gt; H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: McKinley, James T [mailto:james.mckin...@cengage.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:58 PM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
om: Uwe Schindler [u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 3:02 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
Hi.,
About G1GC. We consistently see problems when running the Lucene Testsuite with
G1GC enabled. The people fr
27, 2015 2:49 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org; 'kiwi clive'
> Subject: RE: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
>
> Java 8 update 20 or later is also fine. At current time, always use latest
> update
> release and you are be fine with
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: kiwi clive [mailto:kiwi_cl...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:03 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (
e
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: kiwi clive [mailto:kiwi_cl...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:03 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
>
> Hi Hoss,
> Man
;java-user@lucene.apache.org" ; kiwi clive
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Lucene Version Upgrade (3->4) and Java JVM Versions(6->8)
: I seem to remember reading that certain versions of lucene were
: incompatible with some java versions although I cannot find anyth
: I seem to remember reading that certain versions of lucene were
: incompatible with some java versions although I cannot find anything to
: verify this. As we have tens of thousands of large indexes, backwards
: compatibility without the need to reindex on an upgrade is of prime
: importance
Hello guys,
We currently run with Lucene 3.6 and Java6. In view of the fact that Java7 is
soon to be deprecated, we are keen to move to Java8 and also to move to the
latest version of Lucene. I understand Lucene 5 is coming although we are happy
to move to 4.x as there are lots of goodies there
16 matches
Mail list logo
