lemmatized.
So far no success.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-SnowBall-unexpected-behavior-for-some-terms-tp22991689p23088274.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
: little bit about back compatibility with regards to contrib.
...which were noted in contrib/CHANGES.txt
-Hoss
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h..
-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:26:41 PM
Subject: Re: Lucene SnowBall unexpected behavior for some terms
I am also noticing the same behavior. Does anyone know any solutions?
AlexElba wrote:
Hello,
I was working with lucene snowball 2.3.2 and I switch to 2.4.0.
After swi
gt; From: oleg_gnatovskiy
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:26:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Lucene SnowBall unexpected behavior for some terms
>
>
> I am also noticing the same behavior. Does anyone know any solutions?
>
> AlexElba wrote:
> >
&g
one case spa - spas. spas are not getting
> lemmatize at all...
> BTW I saw the same behavior on solr 1.3
>
>
> Anybody have any idea why?
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-SnowBall-unexpected-behavior-for-some-terms-tp22991689p23049935.html
Sen
e any idea why?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-SnowBall-unexpected-behavior-for-some-terms-tp22991689p22991689.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubs
