2009 3:24 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene Java 3.0.0 RC1 now available for testing
>
> Yes, I would agree with you on the surprise aspect. :-)
>
> But you suggest hiding complexity, and being in control and having
> transparency are mutually exclusi
lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Tue, November 17, 2009 10:53:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: Lucene Java 3.0.0 RC1 now available for testing
>>
>> I understand the reasons, but - if I may ask so late in the game - was
>> this the best way to do this?
>>
>> From a user
mail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 1:06 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene Java 3.0.0 RC1 now available for testing
>
> So will I need to use 2 fields, one filed is analyzed and the other
> field is binary, to replace one compressed fie
/about/jobs.html?mls
Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR
- Original Message
> From: Glen Newton
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, November 17, 2009 10:53:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Lucene Java 3.0.0 RC1 now available for testing
>
> I unde
I understand the reasons, but - if I may ask so late in the game - was
this the best way to do this?
>From a user (developer) perspective, this is an implementation issue.
Couldn't this have been done behind the scenes, so that when I asked
for Field.Index.ANALYZED && Field.Store.COMPRESS, instea
il: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Glen Newton [mailto:glen.new...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:36 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene Java 3.0.0 RC1 now available for testing
Could someone send me where the rationale for the removal of
COMPRESSED f
Here is some of the history:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-652
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960
Glen Newton wrote:
> Could someone send me where the rationale for the removal of
> COMPRESSED fields is? I've looked at
> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-a
ee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Glen Newton [mailto:glen.new...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:36 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene Java 3.0.0 RC1 now available fo
Could someone send me where the rationale for the removal of
COMPRESSED fields is? I've looked at
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-3.0.0-rc1/changes/Changes.html#3.0.0.changes_in_runtime_behavior
but it is a little light on the 'why' of this change.
My fault - of course - f
Hello Lucene users,
On behalf of the Lucene dev community (a growing community far larger than
just the committers) I would like to announce the first release candidate
for Lucene Java 3.0.
Please download and check it out - take it for a spin and kick the tires. If
all goes well, we hope
10 matches
Mail list logo
