Re: Lucene Index backward compatibility related question

2012-08-28 Thread Michael McCandless
Small correction here: you are able to "write" to a 3.x index using 4.0. It's just that the newly created segments will be written using the Lucene4x codec. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Stephen Howe wrote: > Paul, > > So long as you are not w

Re: Lucene Index backward compatibility related question

2012-08-27 Thread Stephen Howe
Paul, So long as you are not writing to the 3.x index, it appears Lucene 4.0 can read the indexes in a read only format. See Mike McCandle's blog post http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2012/07/lucene-400-alpha-at-long-last.html about the alpha release codecs. As to whether or not that codec allows yo

Re: Lucene Index backward compatibility related question

2012-08-27 Thread Jack Krupansky
to latest file format (LUCENE-3082)." Bottom line: Write a test and see for yourself. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Sitowitz, Paul Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 1:31 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: sitow...@gmail.com Subject: Lucene Index backward compat

Lucene Index backward compatibility related question

2012-08-27 Thread Sitowitz, Paul
Hello, I have two products that are using Lucene: The first product creates the Lucene indexes for some data using Lucene version 3.01. The second product utilizes the indexes created by the first product for text search purposes and is also using Lucene 3.01. I understand that the latest vers