Re: Lucene Index Structure

2008-08-21 Thread David Lee
I see, ok. Thanks to both of you! On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Michael McCandless < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, the inverted index *will* store positional information (in the *.prx > files) even if term vectors are not stored. > > Mike > > > Yonik Seeley wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 21, 20

Re: Lucene Index Structure

2008-08-21 Thread Michael McCandless
Also, the inverted index *will* store positional information (in the *.prx files) even if term vectors are not stored. Mike Yonik Seeley wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:20 PM, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Clarification question: If I don't store term vectors, then I: -- won't h

Re: Lucene Index Structure

2008-08-21 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:20 PM, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Clarification question: > > If I don't store term vectors, then I: > -- won't have information on the position of matching terms > -- I don't have the term frequency vector > > -- but I should still have the frequency of terms

Lucene Index Structure

2008-08-21 Thread David Lee
Clarification question: If I don't store term vectors, then I: -- won't have information on the position of matching terms -- I don't have the term frequency vector -- but I should still have the frequency of terms per document in the .frq file, right? So what's the difference between the term f