Re: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-11 Thread Michael McCandless
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Babak Farhang wrote: > I am not familiar with the details of CFS, but I didn't interpret > Michael's comment to mean that there is actually any rewriting going > on here. The problem here appears to be one of translating the > encrypted/compressed file position to

Re: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-11 Thread Babak Farhang
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > > Unfortunately, current Lucene IndexWriter implementation uses seek / > overwrite when writing term info dictionary. This is described in more > detail here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-532 > Thanks for the enlight

Re: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-10 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Babak Farhang wrote: If "position" is the only thing Lucene needs during writing, then that is good news: seeking backwards and overwriting what's already written--that would be difficult to implement. If Lucene employs a write once strategy for file I/O (w/ no exceptions), then we wont really

Re: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-10 Thread Babak Farhang
terested in storing data from a database in the index, at >> > times I want to encrypt the index when the file is one disk. >> > >> > Currently data stored in the Lucene Index is easily accessible to any >> > program that wants to access it. You cannot store sensitive

RE: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-08 Thread Peter_Lenahan
pplications the price of having unsecure data is >> unacceptable, when secure data is published to a laptop for use offline. >> In this case, the additional time needed to access the index would be >> acceptable. >> >> Examples: Military, Medical, and Financial information.

Re: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-08 Thread patrick o'leary
e price of having unsecure data is >> unacceptable, when secure data is published to a laptop for use offline. >> In this case, the additional time needed to access the index would be >> acceptable. >> >> Examples: Military, Medical, and Financial information. >&

Re: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-08 Thread Karl Wettin
he additional time needed to access the index would be acceptable. Examples: Military, Medical, and Financial information. Thanks, Peter Subject: Re: Lucene Index Encryption <http://markmail.org/message/2munvfksg4gvifek> Actions... From: Michael McCandless (luc...@mikemccandless.com) Dat

Re: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-08 Thread Peter_Lenahan
ndex is easily accessible to any program that wants to access it. You cannot store sensitive data in the index without the fear that it will be readable by all the people that have access to the system. There are two other posts in the mailing list that ask a question about Lucene Index Encryption.

Re: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-07 Thread Peter_Lenahan
s easily accessible to any program that wants to access it. You cannot store sensitive data in the index without the fear that it will be readable by all the people that have access to the system. There are two other posts in the mailing list that ask a question about Lucene Index Encryption. In

RE: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-05 Thread Uwe Schindler
ndex is easily accessible to any > > program that wants to access it. You cannot store sensitive data in the > > index without the fear that it will be readable by all the people that > > have access to the system. > > > > There are two other posts in the mailing list

Re: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-05 Thread Michael McCandless
> have access to the system. > > There are two other posts in the mailing list that ask a question about > Lucene Index Encryption. In both cases, I think that the conservation > was dropped or the feature put off. > > Basically, I am asking for comments on the topic. I might

Re: Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-05 Thread Danil Ε’ORIN
ata stored in the Lucene Index is easily accessible to any > program that wants to access it. You cannot store sensitive data in the > index without the fear that it will be readable by all the people that > have access to the system. > > There are two other posts in the mailing list t

Lucene Index Encryption

2009-05-04 Thread Peter_Lenahan
Index Encryption. In both cases, I think that the conservation was dropped or the feature put off. Basically, I am asking for comments on the topic. I might consider coding the feature, but I would only do it if I am sure that the feature would be useful and accepted back into the core codebase of