Hello.
What about MultiFields.getTerms().iterator().seekCeil(new BytesRef("ski")) ?
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:39 AM Mike Grishaber
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> I am trying to find a way to retrieve a list of the words that matched a
> query. I'm not looking for highlighting, just a list of the
If what you want is to undo the analysis and find text in the original
document that was transformed into the terms that matched your query, that
is what highlighters are for. Do you have a reason not to want to use the
highlighters?
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018, 5:39 PM Mike Grishaber
wrote:
> Hello All
Except TermQuery which does exact match, you can do * by appending
star char. In Oracle Database Sql it is like the % char.
Hope this helps
Best
> On Sep 5, 2018, at 5:38 PM, Mike Grishaber wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> I am trying to find a way to retrieve a list of the words that matched
Hello All,
I am trying to find a way to retrieve a list of the words that matched a
query. I'm not looking for highlighting, just a list of the words. So if I
search for 'ski' and I match on 'skier' and 'skiis', I would like to get
back a list that includes 'skier' and 'skiis'.
Is there an A
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Ziqi Zhang wrote:
=>
> So my question is, how can I achieve the same by using the Lucene API, not
> solr? I looked into the org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermsComponent
> class but it is not very obvious for me.
org.apache.lucene.search.RegexpQu
solr I can do this:
http://localhost:8983/solr/core1/terms?terms.fl=content&terms.regex=^(.*?(\bsurface%20defects\b)[^$]*)$&terms.sort=count&terms.limit=1
So my question is, how can I achieve the same by using the Lucene API,
not s
Term in my view is definitely not any more of a char buffer than a plain
String. It's a unique permutation of a particular field name and its text
value. If you look at its public API, the only way to mutate a Term
instance is by obtaining a reference to underlying BytesRef which is in
itself mutab
it's CharTermAttribute in particular but since there are many such
particular examples -- at some point it becomes Lucene in general.
perhaps the problem is on my end that I'm not familiar enough with
DSL-style, but learning DSL concepts is not a prerequisite for Lucene.
as for the Term being
Are you critiquing CharTermAttribute in particular, or Lucene in general?
It appears CharTermAttribute is DSL-style builder API, just like its
superinterface Appendable - does that not appear intentional and
self-explanatory? Further, I believe Term instances are meant to be
immutable hence no dire
I don't mean to sound critical, but is there a reason that the API is
not simpler?
for example, if I want to read/modify a CharTermAttribute's value, I
need to use toString() to get the value, which is very unintuitive, and
either copyBuffer() or setEmpty() and append().
is there a reason no
Yes. thats exactly the problem. I just found out that analyzer was not
being set correctly.
Thanks,
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Standard analyzer lower cases while indexing and searching.
Correct, but since the toString() of your query still has capital words in
it (like "contentNew:Wireless")
: Standard analyzer lower cases while indexing and searching.
Correct, but since the toString() of your query still has capital words in
it (like "contentNew:Wireless") you obviously didn't build this query
using the StandardAnalyzer -- IndexSearcher doesn't apply any Analyzers
for you when you s
I am using the standard analyzer with luke.
Standard analyzer lower cases while indexing and searching.
The BooleanQuery, finalQuery.toString() in my case below is:
+(+contentNew:wireless +contentNew:fm +contentNew:car
+contentNew:transmitter) +entity:product +(name:wireless fm car
transmitte
How are you constructing your BooleanQuery and what Analyzer are you
using with Luke? You have some capitalized words in your query, and
most analyzers would lowercase those, which may be the issue (perhaps
you indexed the capitalized words?).
Erik
On Feb 16, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Mu
Hi,
I have a query that gets hits via luke. I can see the documents it
finds. But when I run the same query via my java code it returns 0 hits.
Note:
1. I am using standard analyzer while indexing and searching.
2. I have made sure that I am querying the same index via luke or
through my java
I think there are some taglibs that let you call functions on objects,
but you could also considering wrapping Hits in something that is JSTL
friendly, perhaps a List that JSTL knows how to handle.
Otis
--- Omar Didi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the following expression :
>
>
>
> resu
I have the following expression :
results is of type Hits, i want to know if there is a way using Expression
language or jstl to access for example: result.doc(i).
17 matches
Mail list logo
