Re: IndexingChain and TermHash

2010-01-07 Thread Michael McCandless
LUCENE-1410 has the PFor impl, that the PFor codec needs. Mike On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Renaud Delbru wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I have started to look at the PFOR codec. However, when I include the codec > files inside the flex_1458 branch, it misses the > org.apache.lucene.util.pfor.PFor

Re: IndexingChain and TermHash

2010-01-07 Thread Renaud Delbru
Hi Michael, I have started to look at the PFOR codec. However, when I include the codec files inside the flex_1458 branch, it misses the org.apache.lucene.util.pfor.PFor class which is the core of the codec. Where can I find this class ? Thanks, Regards -- Renaud Delbru On 16/11/09 14:01, M

Re: IndexingChain and TermHash

2009-12-11 Thread Renaud Delbru
Hi Michael, I am reporting my experience with the codec interface. I have successfully implemented my own encoding, which is a kind of simplified tree-based encoding (similarly to what you can find in XML IR). You can have more information about my project (siren) on [1]. The basic idea is to

Re: IndexingChain and TermHash

2009-11-16 Thread Renaud Delbru
Hi, On 16/11/09 13:01, Michael McCandless wrote: Yes, the branch is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/branches/flex_1458 Mark (Miller) periodically re-sync's it to trunk. Good, thanks ! All tests should pass, and if you create a new Codec, please share the experienc

Re: IndexingChain and TermHash

2009-11-16 Thread Michael McCandless
Yes, the branch is here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/branches/flex_1458 Mark (Miller) periodically re-sync's it to trunk. All tests should pass, and if you create a new Codec, please share the experience! There are not yet many Codecs in existence... the branch has the "sta

Re: IndexingChain and TermHash

2009-11-16 Thread Renaud Delbru
Hi Michael, I see there is already a huge amount of work already done in LUCENE-1458. Is there a way to checkout the corresponding branch, and start to use it ? At least, to see if I can extend it and create my own Codec. I have started on my side to abstract the indexing chain of Lucene 2.9,

Re: IndexingChain and TermHash

2009-11-14 Thread Michael McCandless
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Renaud Delbru wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for the quick fix. I have tested it (indexing multiple documents + > searching), and it seems to work. > > On 06/11/09 18:09, Michael McCandless wrote: >> >> To be honest, you are sort of forging new territory here :) >>