Thanks Ian, and Mike -- the code below was the result of badly copying
the Javadocs in exasperation and panic: all points taken with gratitude.
Cheers
Lee
On 04/03/2011 16:40, Ian Lea wrote:
Looks basically OK to me. I wonder if you need the isCurrent() check
as well as if (newReader != reade
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Lee Goddard wrote:
> Does this look correct? I am told it is not functioning, in that new
> entries to the index are not being picked-up?
Also be careful w/ threads -- if queries are "in flight", closing the
reader out from other them will cause problems.
--
Mi
Looks basically OK to me. I wonder if you need the isCurrent() check
as well as if (newReader != reader) but shouldn't do any harm.
Likewise there doesn't seem much point in reassigning reader and
creating a new searcher if newReader is the same as reader. But I
don't think that either of those w
Hello list,
Does this look correct? I am told it is not functioning, in that new
entries to the index are not being picked-up?
Thanks
Lee
try {
if (! reader.isCurrent()){
IndexReader newReader = reader.reopen();
if (newReader != reader) {
