Hi Tony,
- Original Message
All,
After playing around with Lucene, we decided to replace old full-text search
engine with Lucene. I got "Lucene in Action" a week ago and finished reading
most of the book. I got several questions.
1) Since the book was written two years ago and Lucen
Lucene code yet and don't know how hard to implement
that.
Tony
>From: "Erick Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Index sync up
>Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:12:16 -0400
>
><
che.org
Subject: Re: Index sync up
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:12:16 -0400
<4> is also easy
From the javadoc:
"*Caution:* Iterate only over the hits needed. Iterating over all hits is
generally not desirable and may be the source of performance issues."
So an iterator should be fin
<4> is also easy
From the javadoc:
"*Caution:* Iterate only over the hits needed. Iterating over all hits is
generally not desirable and may be the source of performance issues."
So an iterator should be fine for all documents, even those > 100. But do be
aware that the entire query gets r
Regarding your first question (the easy one), there is
some information here:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/44312
--- Tony Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> After playing around with Lucene, we decided to
> replace old full-text search
> engine with Lucene.
All,
After playing around with Lucene, we decided to replace old full-text search
engine with Lucene. I got "Lucene in Action" a week ago and finished reading
most of the book. I got several questions.
1) Since the book was written two years ago and Lucene has made a lot of
changes, is there
