good point! I have changed it accordingly
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/LuceneFAQ#LuceneFAQ-WhenIupradeLucene,forexamplefrom8.8.2to9.0.0,doIhavetoreindex?
Hope it is clear now :-)
Am 27.05.21 um 16:39 schrieb Michael Sokolov:
LGTM, but perhaps also should state that if pos
... should *reindex* ( not update )
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> LGTM, but perhaps also should state that if possible you *should*
> update because the 8.x index may not be able to be read by the
> eventual 10 release.
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 7:52 AM Michael We
LGTM, but perhaps also should state that if possible you *should*
update because the 8.x index may not be able to be read by the
eventual 10 release.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 7:52 AM Michael Wechner
wrote:
>
> I have added a QnA
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/LuceneFAQ#Luce
I have added a QnA
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/LuceneFAQ#LuceneFAQ-WhenIupradeLucene,forexamplefrom8.8.2to9.0.0,doIhavetoreindex?
Hope that makes sense, otherwise let me know and I can correct/update :-)
Am 26.05.21 um 23:56 schrieb Michael Wechner:
using lucene-backwa
using lucene-backward-codecs-9.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar makes it work :-)
Thank you very much!
But IIUC it is recommended to reindex when upgrading, right? I guess
similar to what Solr is recommending
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_0/reindexing.html
Am 26.05.21 um 21:26 schrieb Michael Sokolov:
I
I think you need backward-codecs-9.0.0-SNAPSHOT there. It enables 9.0
to read 8.x indexes.
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:27 AM Michael Wechner
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am using Lucene 8.8.2 in production and I am currently doing some
> tests using 9.0.0-SNAPSHOT, whereas I have included
> lucene-backward-
Hi
I am using Lucene 8.8.2 in production and I am currently doing some
tests using 9.0.0-SNAPSHOT, whereas I have included
lucene-backward-codecs, because in the log files it was asking me
whether I have forgotten to include lucene-backward-codecs.jar
org.apache.lucene
