> just because the "last viewed" date has been updated?
>> 2) Is there any way to just update the single field, so that the entire
>> index doesn't have to be rebuilt? (I believe the answer to this one is
>> "no")
>> 3) Is there any sort of d
e done so that the "last
> viewed" property can be created in a separate index?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-index-question-tp25090565p25090565.html
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nab
-
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-index-question-tp25090565p25090565.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.
Hello Scott!
I think your index is just not large really. My Sharehound's indexes of my
corporate LAN is about 10G/10mlns of (really small) documents now, and queries
get really little time, less than a second for non-sorted queries and some more
for sorted. The machine is some P4 with 1G RAM. I u
I recently played around with a 2 million doc index of docs that averaged
between 2-10k. The system had 4 gig of ram and a 3 gig dual core proc (not
using a parallel searcher to take advantage of the extra core)...pretty
beefy, but with 4 times the docs your talking about. I didn't see a query
tha
Hello Scott!
I think your index is just not large really. My Sharehound's indexes of my
corporate LAN is about 10G/10mlns of (really small) documents now, and queries
get really little time, less than a second for non-sorted queries and some more
for sorted. The machine is some P4 with 1G RAM. I u
Lots of memory will help a lot. I have a customer of DBSight and he is
using Intel Core Duo, and configure everything in memory. The index
size is about 700M. When I checked his system's average response time,
it's 12ms! I guess you can estimate what you will get from your beefy
machine.
So it ma
"Scott Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/10/2006 14:14:57:
> Supposed I want to index 500,000 documents (average document size is
> 4kBs). Let's assume I create a single index and that the index is
> static (I'm not going to add any new documents to it). I would guess
> the index would be a
Supposed I want to index 500,000 documents (average document size is
4kBs). Let's assume I create a single index and that the index is
static (I'm not going to add any new documents to it). I would guess
the index would be around 2GB.
Now, I do searches against this on a somewhat beefy mach
That helped thanx.
Praveen.
> Please try using the JDK from Sun. I believe this is the issue
> you're having with Ant and compiling Lucene.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2005, at 9:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the reply. I thought of doing it. I downloaded the latest
>> sou
Please try using the JDK from Sun. I believe this is the issue
you're having with Ant and compiling Lucene.
Erik
On Dec 18, 2005, at 9:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I thought of doing it. I downloaded the latest
source and tried to build it using ant. I am n
Thanks for the reply. I thought of doing it. I downloaded the latest
source and tried to build it using ant. I am new to using 'ant'. It gives
me an error and I think the problem is with 'rmic'. I never came across
this before either. It says -
BUILD FAILED
/projects/keyconcept/praveen/lucene-1.4.
On 12/19/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know that lucene index takes a directory of files to be indexed and
> builds the index. Now is there a way to specify the number of files from
> the directory to be indexed?
>
> I mean if I have a directory of 10,000 files and I
Hi,
I know that lucene index takes a directory of files to be indexed and
builds the index. Now is there a way to specify the number of files from
the directory to be indexed?
I mean if I have a directory of 10,000 files and I want an index of only
2000 files from these 10k files, how can specify
On Friday 20 May 2005 16:21, Robert Newson wrote:
> Paul Elschot wrote:
> > On Friday 20 May 2005 13:58, Max Pfingsthorn wrote:
> >
> >>Hi!
> >>
> >>I was wondering if Lucene has any sort of functionality to distribute
> >
> > indices so that different fields are stored in separate indices but t
Paul Elschot wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 13:58, Max Pfingsthorn wrote:
Hi!
I was wondering if Lucene has any sort of functionality to distribute
indices so that different fields are stored in separate indices but they
still refer to the same document. This would be great for a situation where
t
On Friday 20 May 2005 13:58, Max Pfingsthorn wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was wondering if Lucene has any sort of functionality to distribute
indices so that different fields are stored in separate indices but they
still refer to the same document. This would be great for a situation where
there are many
Hi!
I was wondering if Lucene has any sort of functionality to distribute indices
so that different fields are stored in separate indices but they still refer to
the same document. This would be great for a situation where there are many
large documents which have frequently changing properties
18 matches
Mail list logo
