t;
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 1:31:49 PM
Subject: Improving Search Performance on Large Indexes
Hello,
Currently we are attempting to optimize the search time against an index
that is 26 GB in size (~35 million docs) and I was wondering what
experiences others have had in
, 2007 1:09 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving Search Performance on Large Indexes
Hi Scott,
I met the same situation as you(index 100M documents). If the computer
has only one CPU and one disk, ParallelMultiSearcher is slower than
MultiSearcher.
I wrote an email "Wh
. . . . . .
> Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
>
> - Original Message
> From: Scott Sellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 1:31:49 PM
> Subject: Improving Search Performance on
a-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 1:31:49 PM
Subject: Improving Search Performance on Large Indexes
Hello,
Currently we are attempting to optimize the search time against an index
that is 26 GB in size (~35 million docs) and I was wondering what
experiences others have had in s
Hello,
Currently we are attempting to optimize the search time against an index
that is 26 GB in size (~35 million docs) and I was wondering what
experiences others have had in similar attempts. Simple searches
against the index are still fast even at 26GB, but the problem is our
application
