Re: Hits syncronization

2006-07-16 Thread karl wettin
On 7/16/06, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does the Hits class need to use a Vector for it's cache? Is the cache somehow shared among threads or should this be an ArrayList to avoid synchronization costs? Also, I do not see any backing array size initialization. Is this because the defaul

Hits syncronization

2006-07-16 Thread Mark Miller
Does the Hits class need to use a Vector for it's cache? Is the cache somehow shared among threads or should this be an ArrayList to avoid synchronization costs? Also, I do not see any backing array size initialization. Is this because the default of 10 is optimal? Am I wrong all over the place