Re: Getting terms from unstored fields, doc-wise

2012-07-27 Thread Phanindra R
Thanks a lot Aditya and Andrzej .. Your responses were really helpful. On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > On 26/07/2012 22:04, Phanindra R wrote: > >> Thanks for the reply Abdul. >> >> I was exploring the API and I think we can retrieve all those words by >> using a brute

Re: Getting terms from unstored fields, doc-wise

2012-07-27 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
On 26/07/2012 22:04, Phanindra R wrote: Thanks for the reply Abdul. I was exploring the API and I think we can retrieve all those words by using a brute-force approach. 1) Get all the terms using indexReader.terms() 2) Process the term only if it belongs to the target field. 3) Get all the do

Re: Getting terms from unstored fields, doc-wise

2012-07-26 Thread Aditya
s highly appeciated. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Phani > > > > > > > > > -- > > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion > > > below: > > > > > >

Re: Getting terms from unstored fields, doc-wise

2012-07-26 Thread Phanindra R
llows me to recognize the document in both indices. > > > > Any guidance is highly appeciated. > > > > Thanks, > > Phani > > > > > > ---------- > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >

Re: Getting terms from unstored fields, doc-wise

2012-07-26 Thread in.abdul
her id-type-field which > allows me to recognize the document in both indices. > > Any guidance is highly appeciated. > > Thanks, > Phani > > > -- > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > &

Getting terms from unstored fields, doc-wise

2012-07-26 Thread Phanindra R
Hi, I've an index to analyze (manually). Unfortunately, I cannot rebuild the index. Some of the fields are 'unstored'. I was wondering whether there's any way to get the terms from an unstored field for each doc. Positional information is not necessary. Lucene version is 3.5. The reason am tr