for a quick result (need to submit data for a
conference
this weekend).
thanks,
Nir.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Get-the-terms-and-frequency-vector-of-an-
indexed-but-unstored-field-tf4211430.html#a11981677
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at
> How can I get the data? It must be there, since it's a part of the
> index,
> > or am I wrong?
> >
> > Would be grateful for a quick result (need to submit data for a
> conference
> > this weekend).
> > thanks,
> > Nir.
> >
>
> --
&g
What is advantage to use term
frequency vector?
thanks,
DT
www.ejinz.com Search News
- Original Message -
From: "Kai Hu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2007 8:40 PM
Subject: 答复: Get the terms and frequency vector of an indexed but unstored
field
s and frequency vector of an indexed but unstored field
Thanks a lot, that works 100%!...
Fortunately, I did use the flag to state that Lucene should store the term
frequency vector. Otherwise, I'd have to index 77GB right now... :-)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Get
Thanks a lot, that works 100%!...
Fortunately, I did use the flag to state that Lucene should store the term
frequency vector. Otherwise, I'd have to index 77GB right now... :-)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Get-the-terms-and-frequency-vector-of-an-indexed-but-uns
ull.
> How can I get the data? It must be there, since it's a part of the index,
> or am I wrong?
>
> Would be grateful for a quick result (need to submit data for a conference
> this weekend).
> thanks,
> Nir.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble
? It must be there, since it's a part of the index, or
am I wrong?
Would be grateful for a quick result (need to submit data for a conference
this weekend).
thanks,
Nir.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Get-the-terms-and-frequency-vector-of-an-indexed-but-unstored-
