accept my apologies for not confirming the sent address.
i will try 8.1 tomorrow on my env.
baris
- Original Message -
From: tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2019 10:35:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it
my env.
baris
- Original Message -
From: tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2019 10:35:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
Please send messages to java-user mail list only. It is not
recommended
gt; baris
>
> - Original Message -
> From: tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com
> To: baris.ka...@oracle.com
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2019 9:14:22 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
>
> > If You could index these entries and stil
s a bug in Lucene 6.6.
Best regards
- Original Message -
From: baris.ka...@oracle.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com,
erickerick...@gmail.com, a...@linux.com, baris.ka...@oracle.com,
luc...@mikemccandless.com
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 10:49:05 AM GMT -05:00 US/C
thanks for confirming. StandardAnalyzer does not do stemming.
So, MAINS case has some other reason.
Best regards
- Original Message -
From: tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2019 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery
16, 2019 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
Hi,
you said you are using standard analyzer. If so, you are not using any
stemmer at all (please see the analyzer's Javadocs).
2019年6月16日(日) 11:43 Baris Kazar :
>
> Hello,-
> Erick ex
ck...@gmail.com, a...@linux.com, baris.ka...@oracle.com,
> luc...@mikemccandless.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 10:48:47 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
>
> i see, i am using an older version 6.6 and we should switch to Your 8.1
&g
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com,
erickerick...@gmail.com, a...@linux.com, baris.ka...@oracle.com,
luc...@mikemccandless.com
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 10:48:47 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
i see, i am using an older
work ok any consonant at the end except s works in this
case.
Case #3 had +contentDFLT:mains~2 but not +contentDFLT:"mains~2".
i am using fuzzy query with ~ from Query.builder and that is not
PhraseQuery.
Similarly FuzzyQuery with input "mains" (it has to be lowercase
since
ote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Tomoko,-
> >>>>
> >>>> That is strange indeed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Something is wrong when i use mains but maink, mainl, mainr,mainq,
> >>>> maint all work ok any consonant at
ins~2".
i am using fuzzy query with ~ from Query.builder and that is not
PhraseQuery.
Similarly FuzzyQuery with input "mains" (it has to be lowercase
since it does not go through StandardAnalyzer) is also not
PhraseQuery.
can there be a clearer sample case for ComplexPhraseQuery
, mainl, mainr,mainq,
maint all work ok any consonant at the end except s works in this case.
Case #3 had +contentDFLT:mains~2 but not +contentDFLT:"mains~2".
i am using fuzzy query with ~ from Query.builder and that is not
PhraseQuery.
Similarly FuzzyQuery with input "mains
+contentDFLT:"mains~2".
i am using fuzzy query with ~ from Query.builder and that is not PhraseQuery.
Similarly FuzzyQuery with input "mains" (it has to be lowercase since it does
not go through StandardAnalyzer) is also not PhraseQuery.
can there be a clearer sample case fo
from Query.builder and that is not PhraseQuery.
>
> Similarly FuzzyQuery with input "mains" (it has to be lowercase since it does
> not go through StandardAnalyzer) is also not PhraseQuery.
>
> can there be a clearer sample case for ComplexPhraseQuery please in the docs?
>
>
uilder and that is not
PhraseQuery.
Similarly FuzzyQuery with input "mains" (it has to be lowercase since it
does not go through StandardAnalyzer) is also not PhraseQuery.
can there be a clearer sample case for ComplexPhraseQuery please in the
docs?
did You also index "MAI
parser for such complex phrase query.
https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_1_0/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/complexPhrase/ComplexPhraseQueryParser.html
Tomoko
2019年6月13日(木) 6:16 :
>
> Ok, i think only this very specific only "mains" has an issue.
>
> all i knew about L
Ok, i think only this very specific only "mains" has an issue.
all i knew about Lucene was fine :) Great...
i have one more question:
which one is advised to use: FuzzyQuery or the Query.parser with search
string~ appended?
The second one will go through analyzer and make sea
ROUGH NEW HAMPSHIRE UNITED STATES
Why is the fuzzy query ignored?
Even if i have separate fields for street, city,region, country, this
fuzzy query issue will come into place for words with multiple parts
like main dunstable etc., right?
Best regards
On 6/12/19 11:36 AM, baris.ka...@oracle
Tomoko,-
Thank You for Your suggestions. i am trying to understand it and i
thought i did :)
but it does not work with FuzzyQuery when i used with a *single* large
TextField like street=...value... city=...value... region=...value...
country=...value... (with or without quotes for the
t regards
>
>
> On 6/10/19 2:46 PM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
> > Somehow " is causing an issue as this should return street with MAIN:
> >
> > [contentDFLT:street="MAINS"~2, +contentDFLT:"city nashua",
> > +contentDFLT:"region
eturn street with MAIN:
[contentDFLT:street="MAINS"~2, +contentDFLT:"city nashua",
+contentDFLT:"region new-hampshire", +contentDFLT:"country united
states"] -> this was with fuzzyquery on MAINS
Best regards
On 6/10/19 2:24 PM, baris.ka...@oracle.com
anQuery.add(new FuzzyQuery(new
> org.apache.lucene.index.Term(field, "MAINS")), BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);
> booleanQuery.add(Utils.createPhraseQuery(phraseAnalyzer, field,
> "NASHUA"), BooleanClause.Occur.MUST);
> booleanQuery.add(Utils.createPhra
But when i switch to MAINS~ then fuzzy query does not work.
i need to say something with the q1 only in the booleanquery:
it tries to match the MAIN in street, city, region and country
which are
in a single TextField field.
But i dont want this. that is why i need to street="..." etc wh
> i make sure i specify a string with 1 edit away misspelled and that
> never gets hit but the word with correct spelling is in the index.
How long are your query terms and the actual word? For fuzzy query to
match, your edit distance needs to be less than the smaller of the
query and the actual w
hen i switch to MAINS~ then fuzzy query does not work.
i need to say something with the q1 only in the booleanquery:
it tries to match the MAIN in street, city, region and country which are
in a single TextField field.
But i dont want this. that is why i need to street="..." etc when searchin
i switch to MAINS~ then fuzzy query does not work.
> >
> >
> > i need to say something with the q1 only in the booleanquery:
> > it tries to match the MAIN in street, city, region and country which are
> > in a single TextField field.
> > But i dont want th
> in a single TextField field.
> But i dont want this. that is why i need to street="..." etc when searching.
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> On 6/10/19 11:31 AM, Tomoko Uchida wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > just for the basic verification, can you find the doc
On 6/10/19 11:31 AM, Tomoko Uchida wrote:
Hi,
just for the basic verification, can you find the document without
fuzzy query? I mean, does this query work for you?
Query query = parser.parse("MAIN");
Tomoko
2019年6月11日(火) 0:22 :
why cant the second set not work at all?
it is indexed a
t="..." city="..." etc.
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> On 6/10/19 11:23 AM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
> > i dont know how to use Fuzzyquery with queryparser but probably You
> > are suggesting
> >
> > QueryParser parser = new QueryParser(fi
why cant the second set not work at all?
it is indexed as Textfield like street="..." city="..." etc.
Best regards
On 6/10/19 11:23 AM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
i dont know how to use Fuzzyquery with queryparser but probably You
are suggesting
QueryParser pars
i dont know how to use Fuzzyquery with queryparser but probably You are
suggesting
QueryParser parser = new QueryParser(field, analyzer) ;
Query query = parser.parse("MAINS~2");
booleanQuery.add(query, BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);
am i right?
Best regards
On 6/10/19 10:47 AM, A
i am using standardanalyzer.
Best regards
On 6/9/19 11:22 AM, Tomoko Uchida wrote:
Hi,
What analyzer do you use for the text field? Is the term "Main"
correctly indexed?
2019年6月8日(土) 9:13 Baris Kazar :
Hi,-
i cant get FuzzyQuery working for searching with a query like Mains
How do i check how it is indexed? lowecase or uppercase?
only way is now to by testing.
i am using standardanalyzer.
Best regards
On 6/9/19 11:57 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 8:53 PM Tomoko Uchida
wrote:
Hi,
What analyzer do you use for the text field? Is the term "Main"
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 8:53 PM Tomoko Uchida
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What analyzer do you use for the text field? Is the term "Main"
> correctly indexed?
Agreed. Also, it would be good if you could post your actual code.
What analyzer are you using? If you are using StandardAnalyzer, then
all of your
Hi,
What analyzer do you use for the text field? Is the term "Main"
correctly indexed?
2019年6月8日(土) 9:13 Baris Kazar :
>
> Hi,-
> i cant get FuzzyQuery working for searching with a query like Mains~2 to
> find the word Main in a TextField.
&g
Hi,-
i cant get FuzzyQuery working for searching with a query like Mains~2 to find
the word Main in a TextField.
Any suggestions please?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands
For problem#1 the following fuzzyquery ALONE does not catch any results
when i run it alone in the BooleanQuery and with either SHOULD or MUST
occurrence. such as:
[contentDFLT:MAIN~2]
For problem#1 again the query is as follows:
[+contentDFLT:"street", ->PhraseQuery
content
They only differ in 1 char and 5 letters long one 4 letters long the
correct word:
Mains vs Main (correct)
FuzzyQuery Mains~2 cannot catch anything with Main in the first 74 hits.
the 75th hit has Main word.
Best regards
On 6/7/19 2:44 PM, Atri Sharma wrote:
i make sure i specify a
PM, Atri Sharma wrote:
Is your FuzzyQuery matching any documents at all?
It would be helpful if you could post your entire query. It might be
happening that your Fuzzy query is not matching any hits, but when you
specify it as a MUST clause, then it becomes a necessary condition for
any hit to be
>However, with MUST
> clause, that restriction is lifted.
I meant that with a SHOULD clause, that restriction is lifted i.e. a
query can score hits even if SHOULD clause does not match the hit (but
other MUST clauses do match).
Is your FuzzyQuery matching any documents at all?
It would be helpful if you could post your entire query. It might be
happening that your Fuzzy query is not matching any hits, but when you
specify it as a MUST clause, then it becomes a necessary condition for
any hit to be returned by your
May i ask this question about FuzzyQuery?
When i select BooleanClause.Occur.MUST for a FuzzyQuery i dont get any
results back but with
Occur.SHOULD i get some results, though.
what is the meaning of Occur.MUST for FuzzyQuery?
I want Lucene to give me best result from FuzzyQuery, i thought
You mean the total number of edits between those strings must be <= 2?
If so, you must index the entire "Lucene Apache Group" as a single
token, and likewise do a FuzzyQuery with the entire "Luceni Apachi
Group", etc.
If instead you do tokenize and use BooleanQuery to
Hi,
I need to implement a function that performs fuzzy search on multiple terms
in the way that a summarized distance 2 from ALL terms is allowed. For
example query:
Lucene Apache Group
with maximum distance 2 should match:
Luceni Apachi Group
Lucen Apache Group
Luce Apache Group
but not:
Luce
Nevermind, I just wrote a custom function that outputs the edit type for
each word.
Thanks
Hello,
In the FuzzyQuery I see it is possible to control the char transposition
option by a boolean (which btw seems hardcoded and not configurable ).
Is it possible to control the other edit types (char insertion, deletion or
substitution) that are allowed somewhere in the code?
Thanks,
Manuel
oc update. Again, apologies to all if I missed this
> point in the documentation.
>
> Best,
>
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:19 AM
> To: Lucene Users
> Subje
]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:19 AM
To: Lucene Users
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery with short words
I think so? The default prefixLength is 0 ...
Just make sure you're not hitting the maxExpansions limit (default is
50). Ie, if your index has many other terms within edit distance 2 o
t;
to rank below the top 50, and be pruned.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> All,
> Apologies if I missed this in the documentation, but should:
>
> FuzzyQuery q = new FuzzyQuery(new Term("field",
All,
Apologies if I missed this in the documentation, but should:
FuzzyQuery q = new FuzzyQuery(new Term("field", "ab"), 2)
retrieve a document that contains:
abcd
and vice versa.
Same question for: xy~1 and a document that contains "x".
Will submit test case i
FuzzyQuery constructor now takes parameter maxEdits instead of parameter
minSimilarity. But I'm unclear how to map from the old value to the new
value or whether they are unrelated and can no longer be compared.
I was previously using a minsimilarity of 0.5f
thanks
icky, eg see how FuzzyQuery sets the per-term score in
FuzzyTermsEnum using BoostAttribute.
Rob's answer (on that stackoverflow question) is a nice solution,
since it make a single Automaton matching the right (fuzzy + prefix)
terms ... maybe you could make your own TermsEnum that somehow finds
Hi Jack, sorry for confusing you. I understand that it would be great if a
minimal data set can be provided to repro the problem. But I was unable to
do that..
Hi Michael,
Thank you! That is the problem! I changed the maxExpansions to 100 and the
results are found.
About my second question, the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:43 PM, George Kelvin
wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> The problematic query is "scar"+"wads".
>
> There are several (more than 10) documents in the data with the content
> "star wars", so I think that query should be able to find all these
> documents.
>
> I was trying to provide a
- and
unable to help you any further.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: George Kelvin
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:43 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions about FuzzyQuery in Lucene 4.x
Hi Jack,
The problematic query is "scar"+"wads&
gt; -Original Message- From: George Kelvin
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 12:28 PM
>
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Questions about FuzzyQuery in Lucene 4.x
>
> Hi Jack,
>
> ed is set to 1 here and I have lowercased all the data and queries.
>
> R
t data and the query -
all the literals. In other words, construct a minimal test case that shows
the failure.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: George Kelvin
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 12:28 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions about FuzzyQuery in
.
>
> Another factor to take into consideration is that a case change ("Star"
> vs. "star") also counts as an edit.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: George Kelvin
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 11:49 AM
> To: java-user@lu
9, 2013 11:49 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions about FuzzyQuery in Lucene 4.x
Hi Jack,
Thanks for your reply!
I don't think I passed the prefixLength parameter in.
Here is the code I used to build the FuzzyQuery:
String[] words = str.split("\\
Let's see your code that calls FuzzyQuery . If you happen to pass a
prefixLength (3rd parameter) of 3 or more, then "ster" would not match
"star" (but prefixLength of 2 would match).
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: George Kelvin
Sent: Monday, Ja
FWIW, new FuzzyQuery(term, 2 ,0) is the same as new FuzzyQuery(term), given
the current values of defaultMaxEdits (2) and defaultPrefixLength (0).
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lea
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:44 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
See the javadocs for FuzzyQuery to see what the parameters are. I
can't tell you what the comment means. Possible values to try maybe?
--
Ian.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:34 PM, algebra wrote:
> is true Ian, o code is good.
>
> The only thing that I dont understand is a line:
&
is true Ian, o code is good.
The only thing that I dont understand is a line:
Query query = new FuzzyQuery(term, 2 ,0); //0-2
Whats means 0 to 2?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/FuzzyQuery-in-lucene-4-0-tp4031871p4031879.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java
oc.add(new Field("fieldname", list.get(i), Field.Store.YES,
> Field.Index.ANALYZED));
> iwriter.addDocument(doc);
> }
>
> iwriter.close();
>
> IndexReader reader = IndexReader.open(directory);
> IndexSearcher isearcher = new IndexSearcher(rea
er.addDocument(doc);
}
iwriter.close();
IndexReader reader = IndexReader.open(directory);
IndexSearcher isearcher = new IndexSearcher(reader);
Term term = new Term("fieldname", s);
Query query = new FuzzyQuery(term, 1,0);// 0-2
To
Hi there
Lucene calucaltes the string similarity between two strings s1 and s2 according
to the formula
Similarity = Levenshtein-Distance(s1,s2)/min(Length(s1),Length(s2))
I would have thought Lucene would divide by the length of the longer string. In
particular, the above formula could - in m
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Use an analyzer with Term, FuzzyQuery, BooleanQuery and friends
Hello list
I build my queries programmatically with Term, NumericTerm, FuzzyQuery,
BooleanQuery etc. In particular, I do not use QueryParser to build my query
from a string. Still, I would like to
Hello list
I build my queries programmatically with Term, NumericTerm, FuzzyQuery,
BooleanQuery etc. In particular, I do not use QueryParser to build my query
from a string. Still, I would like to first run the values for my terms through
an analzyer (more precisely, the same analyzer that I
I don't think you can do that directly with MultiFieldQueryParser, but
as Erick said in a similar thread a short while ago "You can create
your own BooleanQuery and just add clauses as you need to".
FuzzyQuery fq1 = new FuzzyQuery(whatever ...);
FuzzyQuery fq2 = new FuzzyQuer
I would like to use MultiFieldQueryParser to serach multiple fields, then in
each field, I want to use fuzzy search. How can that be done? Any example
will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Andy
_1/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/FuzzyQuery.html#FuzzyQuery(org.apache.lucene.index.Term,
float, int)
e.g. new FuzzyQuery(new Term("item.name","thesuffix"), 0.79, 3)
This will match all terms starting with "the" (prefix length 3) and will apply
a fuzzy to the rest (
hrieb "Uwe Schindler" unter :
> Dont use PrefixQuery, only FuzzyQuery. There you pass in the whole term (with
> prefix) and define how many characters are the prefix.
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
de to this:
BooleanQuery bQuery = new BooleanQuery();
FuzzyQuery fuzzyPrefixQuery = new FuzzyQuery(new Term("item.name", termText
+ "*"), 0.79f);
bQuery.add(fuzzyPrefixQuery , Occur.MUST);
Lukas
Am 19.04.10 17:13 schrieb "Uwe Schindler" unter :
> Dont use PrefixQuery, only F
Dont use PrefixQuery, only FuzzyQuery. There you pass in the whole term (with
prefix) and define how many characters are the prefix.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Lukas Österr
//www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Lukas Österreicher [mailto:lukas.oesterreic...@austria.real.com]
>> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 4:43 PM
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Combining PrefixQuery and Fu
April 19, 2010 4:43 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Combining PrefixQuery and FuzzyQuery
>
> Hello.
>
> Is it possible to combine PrefixQuery and FuzzyQuery?
> The search on a term should both be fuzzy but also match with results
> that
> jut begin wit
Hello.
Is it possible to combine PrefixQuery and FuzzyQuery?
The search on a term should both be fuzzy but also match with results that
jut begin with that token (or an approximation of that token).
If it is possible, can you give me an example on how to achieve this?
Currently I only use the
hat terms with
> lower docFreq get a higher score in TermQuery. This score overweighs the
> boosting done by FuzzyQuery (because you index is so small).
>
> If you raise the minSimilarity a little bit, your query matches less terms
> and the rewritten BooleanQuery contains less clauses. A
The problem ist he following:
The docFreq of the term "lucéne" is 2, all other terms have 1 (because
StandardAnalyzer lowercases everything). What happens is, that terms with lower
docFreq get a higher score in TermQuery. This score overweighs the boosting
done by FuzzyQuery (because
> From: stefcl
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, 15 February, 2010 14:13:52
> Subject: Strange Fuzzyquery results scoring when using a low minimal
> distance
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using Lucene v3.
> Please consider the following spellings
to return
FuzzyLikeThisQuery (found in "contrib/queries")
Cheers
Mark
- Original Message
From: stefcl
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 15 February, 2010 14:13:52
Subject: Strange Fuzzyquery results scoring when using a low minimal distance
Hello,
I'm using Lucene
Hello,
I'm using Lucene v3.
Please consider the following spellings
Lucene
Lucéne
lucéne
Lucane
Lucen
When searching for "lucéne" among those words using a FuzzyQuery (with 0.5
edit distance), results show :
1. Lucene 1.0259752
2. Lucane 1.0259752
3. Lucéne 0.95660806
4. lucé
> how to i use lucene search to serach files of the local system
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 2:11 PM, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > according to the LiA book the FuzzyQuery distance is computed as
> >
> > 1- distance
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > please help I am totally puzzled.
> > >
> > > The same query, once with a direct call to FuzzyQuery
> > > succeeds while the same query with QueryParser fails.
> > >
> > > What am
On Dec 17, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
FuzzyQuery (in the 2.2.0 API) may take 3 arguments,
term , minimumSimilarity and prefixLength
Is there any syntax to specify the 3rd argument
in a query term for QueryParser?
(I haven't found any the current docs)
No, there isn't
I am totally puzzled.
> >
> > The same query, once with a direct call to FuzzyQuery
> > succeeds while the same query with QueryParser fails.
> >
> > What am I missing?
> >
> > Sorry, I'm using pylucene (with lucene-java-2.2.0-603782)
> >
> &g
See in Lucene FAQ:
"Are Wildcard, Prefix, and Fuzzy queries case sensitive?"
On Dec 17, 2007 11:27 AM, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please help I am totally puzzled.
>
> The same query, once with a direct call to FuzzyQuery
>
how to i use lucene search to serach files of the local system
On Dec 17, 2007 2:11 PM, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to the LiA book the FuzzyQuery distance is computed as
>
> 1- distance / min(textlen,targetlen)
>
> Given
> def
Hi,
please help I am totally puzzled.
The same query, once with a direct call to FuzzyQuery
succeeds while the same query with QueryParser fails.
What am I missing?
Sorry, I'm using pylucene (with lucene-java-2.2.0-603782)
#!/usr/bin/python
import lucene
from lucene import *
lucene.i
Hi,
according to the LiA book the FuzzyQuery distance is computed as
1- distance / min(textlen,targetlen)
Given
def addDoc(text, writer):
doc = Document()
doc.add(Field("field", text,
Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED))
writer.addDocument(doc)
Hi,
FuzzyQuery (in the 2.2.0 API) may take 3 arguments,
term , minimumSimilarity and prefixLength
Is there any syntax to specify the 3rd argument
in a query term for QueryParser?
(I haven't found any the current docs)
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numer
Hi!
Imagine an index holding documents in different languages and country.
Language+country is what I call a context and I build and hold a QueryFilter
for each context.
When performing a fuzzy search, FilteredTermEnum doesn't care about any
contexts at all (well, how should it :). It builds a
: A possible solution is store in a document object two fields: the original
: and the lowercased. I use the last one to make the query, and the other one
: to show the results. It works, but it doesnt smell good!
if your analyzer is what does hte lowercasing then you don't need two
seperate fi
nd the other
> one
> to show the results. It works, but it doesnt smell good!
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Eloi
>
>
> On 7/6/07, Daniel Noll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 06 July 2007 11:39:00 Eloi Rocha Neto wrote:
> > > Hi,
&g
, but it doesnt smell good!
Thanks for your help!
Eloi
On 7/6/07, Daniel Noll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 06 July 2007 11:39:00 Eloi Rocha Neto wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >Anyone knows how to make a case insensitive search using a
> FuzzyQuery?
> &g
o show the results. It works, but it doesnt smell good!
Thanks for your help!
Eloi
On 7/6/07, Daniel Noll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 06 July 2007 11:39:00 Eloi Rocha Neto wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Anyone knows how to make a case insensitive search using a
FuzzyQuery?
>
07 11:39:00 Eloi Rocha Neto wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Anyone knows how to make a case insensitive search using a
FuzzyQuery?
>
>I want that the results coming from "PP-Trip SubAlcance Seq
Negativa",
> "pp-trip subAlcance seq negativa" and "PP-TRIP SUBALCANCE SE
On Friday 06 July 2007 11:39:00 Eloi Rocha Neto wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Anyone knows how to make a case insensitive search using a FuzzyQuery?
>
>I want that the results coming from "PP-Trip SubAlcance Seq Negativa",
> "pp-trip subAlcance seq negativa" an
Hi,
Anyone knows how to make a case insensitive search using a FuzzyQuery?
I want that the results coming from "PP-Trip SubAlcance Seq Negativa",
"pp-trip subAlcance seq negativa" and "PP-TRIP SUBALCANCE SEQ NEGATIVA" be
the same. The field must be inde
Last week I send a message with a doubt in a FuzzyQuery. I am working with
Lucene 2.1.0.
I would like to recover files including the set of strings
"société américaine" and "sociétés américaines"
from a fuzzy query relating the string "société américain"
I crea
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
