On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Simon McDuff wrote:
>
> Hi Simon W.,
> See comments below.
>> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:49:03 +0200> Subject: Re: Flushing Thread
>> From: simon.willna...@gmail.com
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> hey simon ;
Hi Simon W.,
See comments below.
> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:49:03 +0200> Subject: Re: Flushing Thread
> From: simon.willna...@gmail.com
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> hey simon ;)
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Simon McDuff wrote:
> &
as filled up you notify another thread
that its time for flush and go out and call commit. You can then over
time find out what is the right RAM buffer to saturate IO, don't
create too many segments to kill performance due to too many
background merges and maximise in memory throughput.
simonw
eve
great performance in multithreaded environment!
Thank you
Simon M.
> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:52:19 +0200
> Subject: Re: Flushing Thread
> From: simon.willna...@gmail.com
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> hey,
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Simon McDuff wrote:
>
you have
many deletes then pull a reader without applying deletes.
simon
>
> Do I understand correctly ? Did I miss something ?
>
> Simon
>
>> From: luc...@mikemccandless.com
>> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:02:42 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Flushing Thread
>> To: jav
bject: Re: Flushing Thread
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> This has already been fixed on Lucene 4.0 (we now have fully
> concurrent flushing), eg see:
>
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/05/265-indexing-speedup-with-lucenes.html
>
> Mike McCandless
>
&
This has already been fixed on Lucene 4.0 (we now have fully
concurrent flushing), eg see:
http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/05/265-indexing-speedup-with-lucenes.html
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Simon McDuff wrote:
>
> I see some behavio
I see some behavior at the moment when I'm flushing and would like to know if I
can change that.
One main thread is inserting, when it flushes, it blocks.
During that time my main thread is blocking. Instead of blocking, Could it
spawn another thread to do that ?
Basically, would like to h
