I'll think about your ideas and see which one works best for my project. Thank
you.
> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:11:58 -0700
> Subject: Re: Fields with multiple values...
> From: mark.a.fergu...@gmail.com
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> One approach is to use dyn
One approach is to use dynamic fields, making the value of the second field
part of the name of the first field. So for example, you would have:
doc.Add (new Field ("Field1_A", "C", Field.Store.YES,
Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED));
doc.Add (new Field ("Field1_B", "D", Field.Store.YES,
Field.Index.UN_TO
Dragon Fly wrote:
I'd like to get a hit if I do:
Field1:A AND Field2:C
This is fine because that's how Lucene works. However, I do not want to get a
hit if I do:
Field1:A AND Field2:D
The reason that I don't want a hit is because A is the first element in Field1
and D is the second el
Well, you could index with your index as part of the value...
doc.Add (new Field ("Field1", "1A", Field.Store.YES,
Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED));
doc.Add (new Field ("Field1", "2B", Field.Store.YES,
Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED));
// Add 2 values to Field2.
doc.Add (new Field ("Field2", "1C", Field.Store
> But you'd have to do result consolidation.
That's what I'm trying to avoid. I could get a lot of hits (e.g. 100,000 hits)
and will have to load all the documents to remove the duplicates.
> Subject: RE: Fields with multiple values...
> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18
Hi Dragon Fly,
You could split the original document into multiple Lucene Documents,
one for each array index, all sharing the same "DocID" field value.
Then your queries "just work". But you'd have to do result
consolidation, removing duplicate original docs when you get matches at
multiple arr
Hi,
Let's say I have a single document with 2 fields (namely Field1 and Field2). 2
values are added to each field like below.
// Add 2 values to Field1.
doc.Add (new Field ("Field1", "A", Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED));
doc.Add (new Field ("Field1", "B", Field.Store.YES, Field.Ind
