RE: FW: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-26 Thread Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men
Onderwerp: Re: FW: CVS Lucene 2.0 Term.field is interned, so equals() isn't needed. -Yonik On 4/26/05, Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Term other = (Term) o; > return field.equals(other.field) &&

RE: FW: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-26 Thread Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men
ley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 26 april 2005 16:04 Aan: java-user@lucene.apache.org CC: Lucene Users List Onderwerp: Re: FW: CVS Lucene 2.0 Term.field is interned, so equals() isn't needed. -Yonik On 4/26/05, Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: FW: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-26 Thread Yonik Seeley
Term.field is interned, so equals() isn't needed. -Yonik On 4/26/05, Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Term other = (Term) o; > return field.equals(other.field) && > text.equals(other.text); > } > Third: if the field values of re

FW: CVS Lucene 2.0

2005-04-26 Thread Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men Verzonden: dinsdag 26 april 2005 15:44 Aan: 'Daniel Naber' Onderwerp: RE: CVS Lucene 2.0 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 26 april 2005 15:36 Aan: Peter Veentjer