the next step.
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 11:15:05 AM
Subject: Re: Extending scoring to eliminate sorting on timestamp
: I used String because the timestamp is a Long and there wasn't
user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:09:12 PM
Subject: Re: Extending scoring to eliminate sorting on timestamp
: For various reasons, we'd like to eliminate the sort step.
can you elaborate on what those reasons are?
FunctionQuery (in the solr code base, you'll fin
'm not sure that the initial query is always going
to be very very fast.
The patch you pointed out looks very very promising.
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:09:12 PM
Subject: Re:
: For various reasons, we'd like to eliminate the sort step.
can you elaborate on what those reasons are?
FunctionQuery (in the solr code base, you'll find lots of discussing in
the archives of this list) can let you use a numeric field value in the
score calculation, but it still uses the Field
For various reasons, we'd like to eliminate the sort step.
Our current query interface takes a start time and end time as an input range:
RangeFilter rf = new RangeFilter("day", start, end, true, true);
hits = searcher.search(query,rf,new Sort(new SortField[]{
