On 2010-06-30 22:16, Apoorv Sharma wrote:
> This implies there is no way to merge two parallel indexes(based on parallel
> reader) to get a new parallel index. Correct me if I am wrong.
Do you mean sequentially, using IW.addIndexes(new
IndexReader[]{index1,index2}), so that the fields from documen
This implies there is no way to merge two parallel indexes(based on parallel
reader) to get a new parallel index. Correct me if I am wrong.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On 2010-06-30 05:12, Apoorv Sharma wrote:
> > while calling addindexes or addindexes with no opt
On 2010-06-30 05:12, Apoorv Sharma wrote:
> while calling addindexes or addindexes with no optimize can any gurantee be
> given about the document order in the new documents given that the order of
> directories/indexreader is fixed.
>
> So is it that ith document coming from jth indexreader will
while calling addindexes or addindexes with no optimize can any gurantee be
given about the document order in the new documents given that the order of
directories/indexreader is fixed.
So is it that ith document coming from jth indexreader will always have some
x(i,j) position in the final merged
