On Feb 1, 2008 9:47 AM, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Cedric Ho wrote:
> >
> > But managing such a set of indexes is not trivial. Especially when
> > need to add redundancies for reliability and update frequently.
> >
> Agreed. Apparently the Solr guys are working on this now. Certainl
Cedric Ho wrote:
But managing such a set of indexes is not trivial. Especially when
need to add redundancies for reliability and update frequently.
Agreed. Apparently the Solr guys are working on this now. Certainly not
trivial to do right. You might want to check out that work.
I want to
Yes, I am aware of the RemoteSearchable and ParallelSearcher. And I am
doing something similiar now. i.e. split the index on multiple
machines.
But managing such a set of indexes is not trivial. Especially when
need to add redundancies for reliability and update frequently.
I bumped into this a w
31 jan 2008 kl. 09.42 skrev Cedric Ho:
I am wondering if there exist any implemenation of
org.apache.lucene.store.Directory which can be distributed across
multiple machines with comparable performance to a local FSDirectory
index, or is such an idea feasible in the first place.
By comparable p
Hi all,
I am wondering if there exist any implemenation of
org.apache.lucene.store.Directory which can be distributed across
multiple machines with comparable performance to a local FSDirectory
index, or is such an idea feasible in the first place.
By comparable performance I mean a 100G index di
