" I have a use case of bulk deletions with solr and want to understand
using soft commits will help or not."
Will help with what? You haven't told us what the problem you're
worried about is. This
might help:
https://lucidworks.com/2013/08/23/understanding-transaction-logs-s
Hi,
I need to understand whether deletions get put in memory by the
NRTCachingDirectory or not. I have a use case of bulk deletions with solr and
want to understand using soft commits will help or not. Please suggest.
Shivam
DISCLAIMER
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended
files that should be deleted, but that is no longer used as of 2.1.
Instead, Lucene computes (using reference counting) which files in the
directory are no longer referenced.
Mike
Anshum wrote:
Hi John,
In case of deletions, it is just a delayed delete. In other words,
the doc
is just
Hi John,
In case of deletions, it is just a delayed delete. In other words, the doc
is just marked as deleted in the deletable file, leaving a void in the
numbering of docs. The actual shifting of document ids happens only when you
optimize the index. In that case the deletables file is used to
Guys (and Gals),
A question on index deletions, what exactly happens to the Lucene document
numbers in an index when a document is deleted? Let's say I have a 5 doc
index.
Document # Doc
0 doc1
; >
> >> I want to set documents in my IndexReader as deleted, but I will
> >> never commit these deletions. Sort of a filter on a reader rather
> >> than on a searcher, and no write-locks.
> >
>
> >> I could go hacking in IndexReader, definalizing it
20 aug 2007 kl. 14.33 skrev Michael McCandless:
"karl wettin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to set documents in my IndexReader as deleted, but I will
never commit these deletions. Sort of a filter on a reader rather
than on a searcher, and no write-locks.
I cou
Thanks Mike, I'll dig around a bit and report back what I did.
20 aug 2007 kl. 14.33 skrev Michael McCandless:
"karl wettin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to set documents in my IndexReader as deleted, but I will
never commit these deletions. Sort of a filter on a
"karl wettin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to set documents in my IndexReader as deleted, but I will
> never commit these deletions. Sort of a filter on a reader rather
> than on a searcher, and no write-locks.
> Perhaps I can pass down a IndexDeletionP
I want to set documents in my IndexReader as deleted, but I will
never commit these deletions. Sort of a filter on a reader rather
than on a searcher, and no write-locks.
Can I do that out of the box?
Perhaps I can pass down a IndexDeletionPolicy to my IndexWriter that
ignores deletions
: Need is to device a solution that will delete all the old records (
: three months). I tried keeping the record of Docid's added but that is
: not really helping cause number of record added can vary. one solution
: can be indexing the date of index also but i can not alter the index
: now.
we
hii erik and other gurus,
I have a big index with millions of document where every indexed document
points to some system files and database rows.
we are archiving the system files and database rows older then three months.
Need is to device a solution that will delete all the old records ( thre
On 6/7/05, Chris D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've been trying to use lucene to index documents that change
> occasionally with fields that change frequently. When I add the
> contents of the file they are removed when I try to delete and readd
> the document. I and am using somethi
Hi list,
I've been trying to use lucene to index documents that change
occasionally with fields that change frequently. When I add the
contents of the file they are removed when I try to delete and readd
the document. I and am using something like the following.
public void index(String stuff, Fi
14 matches
Mail list logo