Re: Default and optimal use of RAMDirectory

2009-01-05 Thread Erick Erickson
> > > From: Michael McCandless > > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > > Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 4:25:13 AM > > > Subject: Re: Default and optimal use of RAMDirectory > > > > > > Actually, things have improved since LIA1 was written a

Re: Default and optimal use of RAMDirectory

2009-01-05 Thread Ariel
better at > it. > > > Otis -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > - Original Message > > From: Michael McCandless > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 4:25:13 AM > >

Re: Default and optimal use of RAMDirectory

2008-12-21 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
> Subject: Re: Default and optimal use of RAMDirectory > > Actually, things have improved since LIA1 was written a few years ago: > IndexWriter now does a good job managing the RAM buffer you assign to > it, so you should not see much benefit by doing your own buffering > with RAMDirec

Re: Default and optimal use of RAMDirectory

2008-12-20 Thread Michael McCandless
Actually, things have improved since LIA1 was written a few years ago: IndexWriter now does a good job managing the RAM buffer you assign to it, so you should not see much benefit by doing your own buffering with RAMDirectory (and if you somehow do, I'd like to know about it!). Instead you should

Default and optimal use of RAMDirectory

2008-12-16 Thread Joseph.Syjuco
Hi all, First of I'd like to say I'm quite pleased to be a part of this mailing list - its even more exciting to know that we have Otis G. and Erik H., authors of (at least in my opinion) the Lucene Bible - Lucene in Action, actively answering all these inquiries =) We're currently in the initia