Re: ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-22 Thread Alan Woodward
t a List of all >> ChildScorer >>>> instances with "MUST" as type and a reference to the Scorer itsself. You >>>> can use those in the FilterScorer's score() method to get subscores for >>>> each child. >>>> >>>

Re: ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-22 Thread Sheng
er's score() method to get subscores for > >> each child. > >> > >> Uwe > >> > >> - > >> Uwe Schindler > >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > >> http://www.thetaphi.de > >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >&g

Re: ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-22 Thread Alan Woodward
e >> >> - >> Uwe Schindler >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >>> -----Original Message- >>> From: Sheng [mailto:sheng...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Thursday,

Re: ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-22 Thread Sheng
e > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sheng [mailto:sheng...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 4:06 PM > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: ConjunctionScorer access > > > > That&#x

Re: ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-22 Thread Sheng
viour > > > >> of a Scorer, create a delegator scorer (e.g. some Filtering Scorer) > > and > > > >> change its behaviour (e.g. filter additional documents,...). This > can > > be > > > >> done by a query that filters other querys. E.g. look at >

RE: ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-22 Thread Uwe Schindler
ne.apache.org > Subject: Re: ConjunctionScorer access > > That's the problem right - none of them are public, and even neither is the > constructor of `ConjunctionScorer`. Moreover, `ConjunctionScorer` needs > access to list of sub-scorers to emit the doc and score. Information like this &

Re: ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-22 Thread András Péteri
; >> > > >> Subclassing ConjunctionScorer would bring you nothing because > internals > > >> are still private - and that's good. > > >> > > >> Uwe > > >> > > >> - > > >> Uwe Schindler > >

Re: ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-22 Thread Sheng
> >> > >> Uwe > >> > >> - > >> Uwe Schindler > >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > >> http://www.thetaphi.de > >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> > >> > >>> -Original Message- >

Re: ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-22 Thread Alan Woodward
that's good. >> >> Uwe >> >> - >> Uwe Schindler >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Sheng

Re: ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-22 Thread Sheng
till private - and that's good. > > Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sheng [mailto:sheng...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday,

RE: ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-22 Thread Uwe Schindler
good. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Sheng [mailto:sheng...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 7:03 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Conj

ConjunctionScorer access

2015-10-21 Thread Sheng
It's a bummer Lucene makes the constructor of ConjunctionScorer non-public. I wanted to extend from this class in order to tweak its behavior for my use case. Is it possible to change it to protected in future releases ?