12:19 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Compressing field content with Lucene 3.0
10x Uwe,
That is fine :)
Cheers,
Ivan
Uwe Schindler wrote:
It is still open to you how you handle it. On my projects I normally
only
store string fields. If I compress them, they
gt; Subject: Re: Compressing field content with Lucene 3.0
>
> 10x Uwe,
>
> That is fine :)
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
> Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > It is still open to you how you handle it. On my projects I normally
> only
> > store string fields. If I compress them, th
i.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Vasilev [mailto:ivasi...@sirma.bg]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:50 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Compressing field content with Lucene 3.0
10x Uwe for your answer,
It is good news that data compr
> From: Ivan Vasilev [mailto:ivasi...@sirma.bg]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:50 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Compressing field content with Lucene 3.0
>
> 10x Uwe for your answer,
>
> It is good news that data compressed with Field.Store.
Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Vasilev [mailto:ivasi...@sirma.bg]
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 7:13 PM
To: LUCENE MAIL LIST
Subject: Compressing field content with Lucene 3.0
Hi Guys,
Could you give me advice how to deal with Lucene
LUCENE MAIL LIST
> Subject: Compressing field content with Lucene 3.0
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Could you give me advice how to deal with Lucene 3.0 with 2.4 indexes
> that contain compressed data.
>
> Our case is following - we have code like this:
>
> Field.Store fieldS
Hi Guys,
Could you give me advice how to deal with Lucene 3.0 with 2.4 indexes
that contain compressed data.
Our case is following - we have code like this:
Field.Store fieldStored = storedFieldsSet.contains(fieldName) ?
(fieldValue.length() >= COMPRESS_THRESHOLD ? Field.Store.COMPRESS :
Fi
