ED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 7:57 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Clustering Lucene with 40 Servers
I'm currently investigating the best ways of clustering Lucene.
I've heard of both Solr, Terracotta but do not know how well they scale.
Their examples talk of a 4 node cluste
Hello,
Don't have any of the scalability requirements mentioned in this
thread but the problem is an interesting one.
Lucene needs a connection pool equivalent IMHO or a best practices
method for load balancing.
Opening, locking, reading and writing to remote indexes over RMI
seems good o
s? ...) before others can make useful
suggestions.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Adam Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 2:33:37 AM
Subject: RE: Clustering Lucene with 40 Servers
Hello,
I saw that Doug Cutting had an int
Not quite yet gone up to this scale but here are some points for
consideration based on a smaller scale system I have in production that
may be of interest:
By clustering I presume you are only talking about replication.
When we talk about scaling and using multiple machines we need to think
On 12/28/06, Adam Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I saw that Doug Cutting had an interesting solution for his Technorati website:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg12709.html
It sounds like it's a single-writer, many readers type of system, but quite
robust and ef
--
>> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 10:46:47 -0800
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Clustering Lucene with 40 Servers
>>
>> Some quick questions/points:
>>
>> What is the update rate?
>>
>
Adam
> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 10:46:47 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Clustering Lucene with 40 Servers
>
> Some quick questions/points:
>
> What is the update rate?
>
> The number of nod
etc crashing the servers thereafter.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Clustering-Lucene-with-40-Servers-tf2886546.html#a8064135
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To uns
mber 27, 2006 7:57 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Clustering Lucene with 40 Servers
>
>
> I'm currently investigating the best ways of clustering Lucene.
> I've heard of both Solr, Terracotta but do not know how well they scale.
> Their examples talk of a 4 nod
this seems naïve (I am new to Lucene), but why not keep one copy
of the Lucene index on a NAS and have it shared by all servers?
-Original Message-
From: Biggy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 7:57 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Clustering Luce
AS and have it shared by all servers?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Biggy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 7:57 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Clustering Lucene with 40 Servers
>
>
> I'm currently investigat
: Clustering Lucene with 40 Servers
I'm currently investigating the best ways of clustering Lucene.
I've heard of both Solr, Terracotta but do not know how well they scale.
Their examples talk of a 4 node cluster. This is way too small for my needs.
I have 30x JVMs each handling 3 requests/se
ing-Lucene-with-40-Servers-tf2886546.html#a8064135
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
