>>>> Thanks for all the reply. It help me to understand problem better, but
>>>> is
>>>> it
>>>> possible to create a query that will give additional boost to the
>>>> results
>>>> if
>>>> and only if both of the w
; if
>>> and only if both of the word is found inside the results. This will
>>> definitely make sure that the results will be in the higher up of the
>>> list.
>>>
>>> Can this type of query be created?
>>> --
>>> View this message in context
ssible to create a query that will give additional boost to the results
>> if
>> and only if both of the word is found inside the results. This will
>> definitely make sure that the results will be in the higher up of the
>> list.
>>
>> Can this type o
the results if
> and only if both of the word is found inside the results. This will
> definitely make sure that the results will be in the higher up of the list.
>
> Can this type of query be created?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Boosting-Sear
hello there
i like to know about the Boosting Search results thing
thanks
--- On Sun, 8/2/09, bourne71 wrote:
From: bourne71
Subject: Re: Boosting Search Results
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Sunday, August 2, 2009, 8:14 PM
Thanks for all the reply. It help me to understand problem
.
Can this type of query be created?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Boosting-Search-Results-tp24753954p24784708.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe
; is display first. Why is that? What had i done wrong?
>
> can anyone advise me on this? thanks
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Boosting-Search-Results-tp24753954p24753954.html
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
&g
7; is display first. Why is that? What had i done wrong?
>
> can anyone advise me on this? thanks
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Boosting-Search-Results-tp24753954p24753954.html
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
&g
> When i perform a search, lets say "tall fat", by right the
> results that matches all the keyword should be on top and display first.
Answer of your question lies at the end of this thread:
http://www.nabble.com/Generating-Query-for-Multiple-Clauses-in-a-Single-Field-td24694748.html
e document with only 1 matches of the
keyword like 'tall' is display first. Why is that? What had i done wrong?
can anyone advise me on this? thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Boosting-Search-Results-tp24753954p24753954.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users
Thanks a lot. That was it: new times:
4ms -> mysql
2-4ms -> lucene
Now I tried a few times, with a pause and and open index so it would
simulate the correct behaviour during a server usage of my index.
Regards
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Karl Wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 16 maj
You may need some more data to really compare the performance.
>From previous experience, I would expect MySql's search time would increase
as data grows, but Lucene's time stays almost unchanged.
--
Chris Lu
-
Instant Scalable Full-Text Search On Any Database/Application
16 maj 2008 kl. 19.20 skrev Vinicius Carvalho:
I know its a dumb test
There is a lot of initial latency. You want to "warm" the index.
but what can be done in order to speed things up?
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
karl
Hello there! We are starting with lucene, and in order to prove it's usage
one of the benefits is performance. I do know that lucene (as other full
text search engines) provide many more benefits than using a SGDB.
Ok, so here's a simple test:
I have a Table with 17.700 rows. It is stored on mysql
14 matches
Mail list logo
