Erick Erickson wrote:
I don't believe you can compare scores across queries in any meaningful
way.
I actually investigated this to some degree in my thesis, comparing
different participating systems from the TREC campaigns. It turns out
that some systems' scores (e.g. the top scores for a gi
> weight.normalize(norm);
> > return weight;
> > }
> >
> > Are you simply curious about this, or is it causing you a problem
> somehow?
> >
> > -Yonik
> >
> > -
r).queryNorm(sum);
> weight.normalize(norm);
> return weight;
> }
>
> Are you simply curious about this, or is it causing you a problem somehow?
>
> -Yonik
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
On Dec 6, 2007 2:31 PM, java_user_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the response Hoss.
>
> The score I receive is from the Explaination object. The score stays the
> same regardless of how I boost the single term.
>
> The score of the query:
> apple
>
> Is the same as the score of the query
re as:
> : apple^3
> :
> : But repeating the term will up the score
> : apple apple apple
> :
> : I expected the score to go up when boosting a one term query. Is that a
> : wrong expectation?
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
> --------
first off: if you are looking at the score from the "Hits" class, bear in
mind they are "psuedo-normalized" and don't mean much.
second: a "query" doesn't have a score, a document has a score relative to
a query ... scores can't be compared between different queries.
third: there is a "queryNo
message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Boost-One-Term-Query-tf4900128.html#a14035572
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
