The penny drops. Thank you so much for your time, Chris :-)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 June 2006 18:43
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses on MultiSearcher
: Incidentally, I'm ge
: Incidentally, I'm getting BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses when I search on
: "james", but I don't when I search on "James". Surely the number of clauses
: isn't dependent on the number of hits?!
not the numebr of hits -- just hte number of terms in your index that
start with the prefix.
: However
search for
"dean", "james dean" and "holywood.com" doesn't ?
: -----Original Message-
: From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Sent: 15 June 2006 16:50
: To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: RE: BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses on MultiSearcher
: I'm still trying to get my head around ConstantScorePrefixQuery. Could I
: simply use this as a drop-in replacement for PrefixQuery?
that's what it was designed to do .. you just need to grab a copy of
ConstantScorePrefixQuery and PrefixFilter from the same package
(ConstantScorePrefixQuery is
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 June 2006 18:28
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses on MultiSearcher
I'm still trying to get my head around ConstantScorePrefixQuery. Could I
simply use this as a drop-in replacement for PrefixQuery?
-Original Message--
"james dean" and "holywood.com" doesn't ?
: -Original Message-----
: From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Sent: 15 June 2006 16:50
: To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: RE: BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses on MultiSearcher
:
:
: : I guess the most expens
t: Re: BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses on MultiSearcher
: Did not check it, but solr is using SkippingFilter which is not yet
: commited in Lucene... so this will maybe not work?
Solr des not use SkippingFilter.
-Hoss
-
To unsubscribe, e
: Did not check it, but solr is using SkippingFilter which is not yet
: commited in Lucene... so this will maybe not work?
Solr des not use SkippingFilter.
-Hoss
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
6 16:50
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses on MultiSearcher
: I guess the most expensive thing I'm doing from the perspective of Boolean
: clauses is heavily using PrefixQuery.
:
: I want my user to be able to find e-mail to, cc or from [EMAIL PROTECTED
not mind to spend a few hours to help
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 15 June, 2006 5:49:42 PM
Subject: RE: BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses on MultiSearcher
: I guess the most expensive thing I'm doi
essage-
: From: Rob Staveley (Tom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Sent: 15 June 2006 14:51
: To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses on MultiSearcher
:
: I've just added a 3rd index directory (i.e. 3rd IndexSearcher) to my
: MultiSearcher and I'm getti
Rob Staveley (Tom) wrote:
I guess the most expensive thing I'm doing from the perspective of Boolean
clauses is heavily using PrefixQuery.
I want my user to be able to find e-mail to, cc or from [EMAIL PROTECTED], so
I opted for PrefixQuery on James. Bearing in mind that this is causing me
grie
with BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses on my MultiSearcher, is there a
smarter approach that I should be adopting?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Staveley (Tom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 June 2006 14:51
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses on MultiSearcher
I've just a
I've just added a 3rd index directory (i.e. 3rd IndexSearcher) to my
MultiSearcher and I'm getting BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses errors on queries
which were working happily on 2 indexes.
Here's an example query, which hopefully you'll find self-explanatory from
the XML structure.
8<
14 matches
Mail list logo
