First time I tried this I made it WAY more complex than it is
WARNING: this is from an older code base so you may have to tweak
it. Might be 1.9 code
public class WildcardTermFilter
extends Filter {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
protected BitSet
Erick can you please point me to some example of creating a filtered wildcard
query. I have not used filters anytime before. Tried reading but still am
really not able to understand how filters actually work and will help me
getting rid of MaxClause Exception.
Regards,
Ruchika
Erick Eri
See below:
On Dec 1, 2007 1:16 AM, Ruchi Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Erick/John, thank you so much for the reply. I have gone through the
> mailing list u have redirected me to. I know i need to read more, but some
> quick questions. Please bear with me if they appear to be too simple
Erick/John, thank you so much for the reply. I have gone through the mailing
list u have redirected me to. I know i need to read more, but some quick
questions. Please bear with me if they appear to be too simple.
Below is the code snippet of my current search. Also i need to get score inf
John's answer is spot-on. There's a wealth of information in the user group
archives that you should be able to search on discussing ways of providing
the functionality. One thread titled "I just don't get wildcards at all"
is one where the folks who know generously helped me out.
Once you find ou
Hi,
Your problem is that when you do a wildacrd search, Lucene expands the
wildacrd term into all possible terms. So, searching for "stat*"
produces a list of terms like "state", "states", "stating" etc. (It only
uses terms that actually occur in your index, however). These terms are
all adde
Hi there.
I am a new Lucene user and I have been searching the group archives but
couldn't solve the problem. I have just joined a project that uses Lucene.
We use the StandardAnalyzer for indexing our documents and our query is as
follows when we issue a search string oft* for exa
