Hello.
My main aim is following:
a. Index both on line and doc basis (Line basis for providing phrase
suggestions/infix suggestions. Doc basis for Firing
booleanquery/wildcard query etc.)
b. Yeah for boolean/wildcard etc user input will be "xxx" and "yyy" and
I will show document name.
c. W
On 08/21/2013 09:51 AM, Ankit Murarka wrote:
> Yeah..I eventually DID THIS
>
> Just a small question : Knowing that BooleanQuery/PrefixQuery/WildCardQuery
> might also run fine even if I index the complete document as opposed to doing
> it Line by Line. Shouldn't I do it this way rather tha
Yeah..I eventually DID THIS
Just a small question : Knowing that
BooleanQuery/PrefixQuery/WildCardQuery might also run fine even if I
index the complete document as opposed to doing it Line by Line.
Shouldn't I do it this way rather than indexing each line for
Boolean/Prefix/Wildcard als
On 08/21/2013 08:38 AM, Ankit Murarka wrote:
> Hello.
> I tried with
>
> doc.add(new Field("contents",line,Field.Store.YES,Field.Index.ANALYZED));
>
> The BooleanQuery/PrefixMatch/WildCard all started Running fine..
>
> But it broke the Existing code for Phrase Suggestion/InfixSuggester. Now
>
Hello.
I tried with
doc.add(new Field("contents",line,Field.Store.YES,Field.Index.ANALYZED));
The BooleanQuery/PrefixMatch/WildCard all started Running fine..
But it broke the Existing code for Phrase Suggestion/InfixSuggester. Now
these suggesters are returning Word suggestion instead of Phr
On 08/19/2013 08:17 AM, Ankit Murarka wrote:
> doc.add(new StringField("contents",line,Field.Store.YES));
Did you try with:
doc.add(new Field("contents",line,Field.Store.YES));
?
--
Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it
Hello All,
The smallest possible self contained program using RAMDirectory and no
external classes is being mentioned below.kindly assist me in what might
be wrong.
**package example;
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.Analyzer;
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer;
imp
Hello. Reference to CustomAnalyzer is what I had mentioned.
I created a custom analyzer by using the StandardAnalyzer code. Only
change I made was to comment the LowerCaseFilter in StandardAnalyzer to
create my own analyzer.
Yeah.I am trying to provide a smallest possible self contained prog
If you're using StandardAnalyzer what's the reference to
CustomAnalyzerForCaseSensitive all about? Someone else with more
patience or better diagnostic skill may well spot your problem but I
can't.
My final suggestion is that you build and post the smallest possible
self-contained program, using
Hello. I gave the complete code sample so that anyone can try and let me
know. This is because this issue is really taking a toll on me.
I am so close yet so far.
Yes, I am using analyzer to index the document. The Analyzer is
StandardAnalyzer but I have commented the LowerCaseFilter code from
I was rather hoping for something smaller!
One suggestion from a glance is that you're using some analyzer
somewhere but building a BooleanQuery out of a TermQuery or two. Are
you sure (test it and prove it) that the strings you pass to the
TermQuery are EXACTLY what has been indexed?
--
Ian.
Hello. The problem is as follows:
I have a document containing information in lines. So I am indexing all
files line by line.
So If I say in my document I have,
INSIDE POST OF SERVER\
and in my index file created I have,
INSIDE POST OF SERVER\
and I fire a boolean qu
Well, you have supplied a bit more info - good - but I still can't
spot the problem. Unless someone else can I suggest you post a very
small self-contained program that demonstrates the problem.
--
Ian.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Ankit Murarka
wrote:
> Hello.
> The problem does
Hello.
The problem does not seem to be getting solved.
As mentioned, I am indexing each line of each file.
The sample text present inside LUKE is
\
\
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
>>Size of list array::0\
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
org.com.dummy,INFO,<<
remedialaction != "remedial action"?
Show us your query. Show a small self-contained sample program or
test case that demonstrates the problem. You need to give us
something more to go on.
--
Ian.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ankit Murarka
wrote:
> Hello,
> I am aware of that l
Hello,
I am aware of that link and I have been through that link many
number of times.
Problem I have is:
1. Each line is indexed. So indexed line looks something like
"\"
2. I am easily firing a phrase query on this line. It suggest me the
possible values. No problem,.
3. If I fire
Should be straightforward enough. Work through the tips in the FAQ
entry at
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#Why_am_I_getting_no_hits_.2F_incorrect_hits.3F
and post back if that doesn't help, with details of how you are
analyzing the data and how you are searching.
--
Ian.
On Tue,
Hello All,
I have 2 different usecases.
I am trying to provide both boolean query and phrase search query in the
application.
In every line of the document which I am indexing I have content like :
\
Due to the phrase search requirement, I am indexing each line of the
file as
18 matches
Mail list logo
