On 31/10/2011 21:42, Petite Abeille wrote:
On Oct 31, 2011, at 9:32 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
similarity-preserving hash function was calculated on each sentence, and the
hash was added as a field. The property of the hash was that similar documents
(sentences) would produce a similar hash
On Oct 31, 2011, at 9:32 PM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> similarity-preserving hash function was calculated on each sentence, and the
> hash was added as a field. The property of the hash was that similar
> documents (sentences) would produce a similar hash, with only some bit-level
> perturbati
On 22/10/2011 11:11, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Hi All,
I'm giving a talk at ApacheCon titled "Bet you didn't know Lucene can..."
(http://na11.apachecon.com/talks/18396). It's based on my observation, that over the
years, a number of us in the community have done some
m also using public domain Wikipedia data so can release the code and data
> somewhere if that's of interest.
>
> Cheers
> Mark
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Dawid Weiss
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 October 2011,
pache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, 25 October 2011, 23:17
Subject: Re: Bet you didn't know Lucene can...
> Lucene started out at an avg 3ms but subsequent runs took it down
> dramatically due to OS file caching. The all-in-memory hashset implementation
> clearly did not demonstrate th
> Lucene started out at an avg 3ms but subsequent runs took it down
> dramatically due to OS file caching. The all-in-memory hashset implementation
> clearly did not demonstrate the same speed ups between runs.
I don't say the benchmark was wrong or anything, but this is
surprising. I mean, the
ashSet tests are loaded entirely from file (hence the long start-up
>>> time) and are not a scalable solution because of RAM costs.
>>> MySQL requires an inter-process call as it was not embedded but even using
>>> a remoted Lucene call I get significantly better performance (avg 0.5ms
&g
uires an inter-process call as it was not embedded but even using
>> a remoted Lucene call I get significantly better performance (avg 0.5ms
>> lookup vs MySQL 10ms)
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Gran
l as it was not embedded but even using a
> remoted Lucene call I get significantly better performance (avg 0.5ms lookup
> vs MySQL 10ms)
>
>
> Cheers
> Mark
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> C
here: http://www.juxtasoftware.org/
Erik
On Oct 22, 2011, at 05:11 , Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm giving a talk at ApacheCon titled "Bet you didn't know Lucene can..."
> (http://na11.apachecon.com/talks/18396). It's based on my observation
cene call I get significantly better performance (avg 0.5ms lookup vs
MySQL 10ms)
Cheers
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Grant Ingersoll
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, 22 October 2011, 10:11
Subject: Bet you didn't know Lucene can...
Hi All,
I'm giv
Hi Grant,
In Carrot2 (and Carrot Search's commercial products) we're not using
Lucene as an indexing/ search service directly, but we are re-using a
lot of internal infrastructure (like analyzers, ported snowball
stemmers and other segmentation stuff). We also plan on using the new
language identi
Using Lucene as a recommendation engine.
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Oct 22, 2011, at 6:03 PM, Sujit Pal wrote:
>
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> Not sure if this qualifies as a "bet you didn't know", but one could use
>> Lucene term vectors to construct document vectors for
On Oct 22, 2011, at 6:03 PM, Sujit Pal wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Not sure if this qualifies as a "bet you didn't know", but one could use
> Lucene term vectors to construct document vectors for similarity,
> clustering and classification tasks. I found this out recently (although
> I am probably no
vidual (product) pages. A deeper URL results in a Lucene
BooleanQuery with more clauses.
Hope this is enough (ab)use...
Wouter
> Hi All,
>
> I'm giving a talk at ApacheCon titled "Bet you didn't know Lucene can..."
> (http://na11.apachecon.com/talks/18396). It'
be quite
useful.
-sujit
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 11:11 +0200, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm giving a talk at ApacheCon titled "Bet you didn't know Lucene can..."
> (http://na11.apachecon.com/talks/18396). It's based on my observation, that
> over th
Tell me if you need more details, I am sure the pure storage option is
something very common.
paul
Le 22 oct. 2011 à 11:11, Grant Ingersoll a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> I'm giving a talk at ApacheCon titled "Bet you didn't know Lucene can..."
> (http://na11.apa
Hi All,
I'm giving a talk at ApacheCon titled "Bet you didn't know Lucene can..."
(http://na11.apachecon.com/talks/18396). It's based on my observation, that
over the years, a number of us in the community have done some pretty cool
things using Lucene that don't
18 matches
Mail list logo
