the grouping api. But
> > > > >> currently, it
> > > > >> > was removed (since Lucene 7.0). So, again, do I have any other
> > > > >> alternative,
> > > > >> > apart from re-indexing to use docValues?
> > &g
5). We
> > > >> > are planning to upgrade to Lucene 9 (because of some vulnerabilities
> > > >> > affecting Lucene 5.5.5) and I think asking them to reindex will not
> > go
> > > >> down
> > > >> > well :(
> > &g
avis (<
> kryptonics...@gmail.com>)
> > >> > escribió:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Inside of Zulia search engine, the object being indexed is always
> a
> > >> > > JSON/BSON object and we store the BSON as a stored byte field in
> the
nal reindexing when the searchable
> >> fields
> >> > > change but also allows us to update to the latest lucene version.
> >> > > Combined with using lucene-backward-codecs an older index than the
> >> current
> >> > > major version can be opene
it would be easy to reindex in
>> the
>> > > new format. If you have not, maybe opening with
>> lucene-backward-codecs
>> > > will be enough for your use case.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Matt
>> > >
>> >
gt; fields (or a json/bson) in the index, it would be easy to reindex in
> > the
> > > > new format. If you have not, maybe opening with lucene-backward-codecs
> > > > will be enough for your use case.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Mat
reindex in
> the
> > > new format. If you have not, maybe opening with lucene-backward-codecs
> > > will be enough for your use case.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 2:30 PM Baris Kazar
>
on,
> > > even minor version, I always reindex.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > From: Gus Heck
> > > Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 2:17 PM
> > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re:
case.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matt
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 2:30 PM Baris Kazar
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It is always great practice to retain non-indexed
> > > data since when Lucene changes version,
> > > even minor version, I alwa
d
> > data since when Lucene changes version,
> > even minor version, I always reindex.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > From: Gus Heck
> > Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 2:17 PM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 2:17 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Best strategy migrate indexes
>
> Hi Pablo,
>
> The deafening silence is probably nobody wanting to give you the bad news.
> You are on a mission that may not be feasible, and even if you
It is always great practice to retain non-indexed
data since when Lucene changes version,
even minor version, I always reindex.
Best regards
From: Gus Heck
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 2:17 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Best strategy
Hi Pablo,
The deafening silence is probably nobody wanting to give you the bad news.
You are on a mission that may not be feasible, and even if you can get it
to "work", the end result won't likely be equivalent to indexing the
original data with Lucene 9.x. The indexing process is fundamentally l
Hi all,
I have some indices indexed with lucene 5.5.0. I have updated my
dependencies and code to Lucene 7 (but my final goal is to use Lucene 9)
and when trying to work with them I am having the exception:
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFormatTooOldException: Format version is not
supported (resour
14 matches
Mail list logo
