on [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 8:01 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Another MultiFieldQueryParser question...
UN_TOKENIZED fields are indexed "as is", without going through an
analyzer.
What that means is
1> no casing is done.
2> mu
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 8:01 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Another MultiFieldQueryParser question...
UN_TOKENIZED fields are indexed "as is", without going through an
analyzer.
What that means is
1> no casing is done.
2> multi-word values are stored j
e is that I have a numeric field
that is untokenized and that does not require the wrapper.
Jiho
-Original Message-
From: Doron Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:46 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Another MultiFieldQueryParser question...
"Jiho
eally confuses me is that I have a numeric field
that is untokenized and that does not require the wrapper.
Jiho
-Original Message-
From: Doron Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:46 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Another MultiFieldQueryParser que
"Jiho Han" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/01/2007 10:50:14:
> I looked through the archive a bit and found some Q & A's regarding this
> but I didn't see anything definitive so I thought I'd ask again...
>
> Basically, I have a web page that can search through a database table
> across multiple s
I looked through the archive a bit and found some Q & A's regarding this
but I didn't see anything definitive so I thought I'd ask again...
Basically, I have a web page that can search through a database table
across multiple servers.
So imagine that there are 100 different databases spread across
