ent: Monday, January 26, 2015 11:49 AM
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Absolute term position in scoring
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'd like to ask if this approach: construct a complex query consisting of a
>> boosted "specialized&quo
o: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Absolute term position in scoring
>
> Hello!
>
> I'd like to ask if this approach: construct a complex query consisting of a
> boosted "specialized" part and an "ordinary" part with no boost, - doesn't
32, Yorktown Heights, NY, 10598*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>><http://www.facebook.com/ibmwatson>
>>
>>
>>--
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Inactive hide details for Michael McCandless --
-01/25/2015
> 08:12:18 AM---Maybe SpanFirstQuery? Mike McCandless]Michael McCandless
> ---01/25/2015 08:12:18 AM---Maybe SpanFirstQuery? Mike McCandless
>
> From: Michael McCandless
> To: Lucene Users
> Date: 01/25/2015 08:12 AM
> Subject: Re: Absolute term position in scoring
>
From: Michael McCandless
To: Lucene Users
Date: 01/25/2015 08:12 AM
Subject: Re: Absolute term position in scoring
Maybe SpanFirstQuery?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sa
Maybe SpanFirstQuery?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Luis A Lastras wrote:
> Is it possible to incorporate in Lucene's scoring function the position of
> a matching term (say as measured from the top of the document). The
> scenario is, if the
Is it possible to incorporate in Lucene's scoring function the position of
a matching term (say as measured from the top of the document). The
scenario is, if the set of documents tend to lk about the most important
stuff at the beginning of the document, then we would like to give
preference to
