h Summary makes it more clear what the Hit is about.Not sure but I think
Google does the same in search summaries.-Evert
Original message From: "Shifflett, David [USA]"
Date: 7/11/19 8:38 PM (GMT+08:00) To:
java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [External]
ot;
Date: 7/11/19 8:38 PM (GMT+08:00) To:
java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [External] Re: How to ignore certain
words based on query specifics I just tested this with the
search.highight.Highlighter class.Is this the 'old default highlighter'?I
phrased my question badly.Of c
I just tested this with the search.highight.Highlighter class.
Is this the 'old default highlighter'?
I phrased my question badly.
Of course the stop words shouldn't be highlighted,
as they wouldn't match any query.
My question was really, would the stop words be available for
inclusion in the hi
I'm not au courant with highlighters as I used to be. I think some of them
work using postings, and for those, no, you wouldn't be able to highlight
stop words. But maybe you can use the old default highlighter that would
reanalyze the document from a stored field, using an Analyzer that doesn't
re
Michael,
Thanks for your reply.
You are correct, the desired effect is to not match 'freedom ...'.
I hadn't considered the case where both free* and freedom match.
My solution 'free* and not freedom' would NOT match either of your examples.
I think what I really want is
Get every matching term f
