Thanks for the replies.
I miserably failed to explain my problem. I focused too much on the
content similarity between the fields and completely missed out on
things such as that car brands and tire brands are not propotionally
large compared to the data in my domain. I have tens of thousan
What about boosting documents of the Brand type? You can statically boost
those documents with a log() function or something similar ...
On Dec 14, 2007 8:24 PM, Doron Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that documents having less fields satisfying
> the query worth more than those satisf
It seems that documents having less fields satisfying
the query worth more than those satisfying more fields
of the query, because the first ones are more "to
the point".
At least it seems like it in the example.
If this makes sense I would try to compose a top level
boolean query out of the one-
Karl,
This might work for you:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-293
Regards,
Paul Elschot
On Friday 14 December 2007 18:06:01 Karl Wettin wrote:
> I have an index that contains three sorts of documents:
>
> Car brand
> Tire brand
> Tire pressure
>
> (Please bear with me, the real i
I have an index that contains three sorts of documents:
Car brand
Tire brand
Tire pressure
(Please bear with me, the real index has nothing to do with cars. I
just try to explain the problem in an alternative domain to avoid NDA
conflicts.)
There is a heirarchial composite relationship bet
