It's not bad, the fix is simply to link your new JARs with the Luke
one. As for why you use 2.9, I don't know. It's not officially
released, but that doesn't stop a lot of people from using it. Trunk
is generally stable, so if it works for you, I wouldn't worry too much
about it.
On M
sounds bad...
i use luke 0.9.2 (2009-03-20) who supports lucene until version 2.4. so why do
i use lucene 2.9? are there some other monitoring tools?
Am Freitag, 8. Mai 2009 schrieb Grant Ingersoll:
> This usually means that your index was created using a newer version
> of Lucene than is bun
This usually means that your index was created using a newer version
of Lucene than is bundled with Luke. You will need to get the Luke
minimal jars (no Lucene) and use that along with the Lucene versions
you have.
On May 8, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Timon Roth wrote:
hello list
i am using luc
Which version of luke are you using?
Timon Roth wrote:
hello list
i am using lucene 2.9. when i try to open the index with luke i got an error:
unknown format version: -8
any hints?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubs
hello list
i am using lucene 2.9. when i try to open the index with luke i got an error:
unknown format version: -8
any hints?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: j
