27;re seeing because
> you're
> right,
> adding successively more restrictions should produce smaller result
> counts.
> I suspect
> that if you see what actual queries you're generating (and when you get
> Luke, be
> sure to find the drop-down for "which analyzer&qu
reasonable.)
Is Luke part of Lucene contrib? I recall there is a GUI that lets you view
the indices. Would you please elaborate?
Thanks again!
student_t
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> That certainly doesn't look right. What analyzers are you using at index
> and query time?
>
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your suggestion. I will definitely check that out.
-student_t
Daniel Naber-10 wrote:
>
> On Freitag, 26. September 2008, student_t wrote:
>
>> A. query1 = +(content:(Pepsi))
>
> I guess this is the string input you use for your queries, isn't i
have Pepsi in it with a domain of ca)
yield more hits (398)?
2. Since there are 212 hits of Canadian domains, how can query2 return 398
hits?
Thanks for any pointers!
Cheers,
student_t
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Please-help-to-interpret-Lucene-Boost-results
