Re: Call for MODERATORs on the dev and java-user mailing lists

ailing list is >> roughly *1* (I’ve received about 50 in the last 2 months over the 3 mailing >> lists I've been moderating up to this point), so the effort involved is >> fairly small. >> >> -- >> Steve >> www.lucidworks.com >> >>&g

Re: Call for MODERATORs on the dev and java-user mailing lists

Let me ask if I can get some cycles to do this. I’m interested but I have to check first. SCott scott.c...@lucidworks.com > On Feb 3, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > FYI I’m holding off on creating the INFRA JIRA until Aurelian has > acknowledged subscribing to dev@lucene. > > In t

Re: upgrading lucene 4 to 6

Jamie, I just went through an upgrade from 3 to 5. We used faceting, highlighting, search, explanation, etc ….It took us 3 months and that was a hard push (2 to 3 people dedicated to the effort). Don’t put off the upgrade. The performance is worth the pain. SCott > On Apr 26, 2016, at 12

update of a numerical field in a lucene document

All, I’m missing a not so secret "secret sauce" somewhere in my simple code (say that 5 times real fast - no not “that”). Am trying to show the efficiency increase of delete/create a document in lucene (the old way of updating a document) versus the newly supported mode of being able to update

multivalued index search

What is the best approach to implementing a multivalued index field search in the current version of Lucene? SCott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...

Re: Highlighting deprecation?

checkout the highlight package … https://lucene.apache.org/core/5_3_0/highlighter/org/apache/lucene/search/highlight/package-summary.html SCott > On Dec 1, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Kunzman, Dougl

problem using faceting in 5.3

Hello All, I have been given the envious job of upgrading existing faceted taxonomy indexes from 3.6 to 5.3. To make sure that I have everything in working order, I have written a little program to “smoke test” . Facets retrieved in version 3 should be retrievable in version 5, or our upgrade