Re: ParallelReader fails on Deletion

both cases. > > If that leads nowhere, I'd make sure I had a copy of Luke so I could > reassure myself that the document was actually in both cases. > > After that, I'd think about posting a fragment of both your deletion code > and test case ... > > Best >

ParallelReader fails on Deletion

Hi, I'm using a parallelreader to hold on two indicies. There have to be updated everyday. When I'm performing a deletion e.g. parallelreader.delete(New Term("ID","100)), the documents are still there. When i do the some with normal indexreader e.g. indexreader.delete(New Term("ID","100)) it wo

Incemental Updating

Hi, i have two applications on an windows machine. One is the searchengine where the index is can be searched. The second application runs one time on a day which updates (deletions/adding) the index. My question: The index is already opened (Indexreader) by the frist application. Is there a pro

Re: Sorting

Hi Chris, thanks a lot for your reply. Currently I'm using a parallelreader, cause one part of index is in the memory and one part is on disk. It seems like parallelreader has a problem with sorting. So i have three questions: 1. Is there a know bug in the parallelreader? 2. Is it true, that onl

Re: Sorting

Hi, thanks a lot for you helpfull answers :-)) I think I will try i like karl suggest, cause i have to update the index every day :-)) Thanks a lot :-)) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Sorting-tf2019404.html#a5558212 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com.

Re: SpellChecker

Hi Mark, thanks a lot for the link. I already found this but i can not use the libarys import org.apache.lucene.search.spell.Dictionary; import org.apache.lucene.search.spell.LuceneDictionary; import org.apache.lucene.search.spell.SpellChecker; cause is seems like there are not included in Luce

SpellChecker

Hi, i had seen that a suggestion-tool (like google: Did you mean xyz?) can be implemented with a addon for lucene which is called SpellingChecker. Is this correct or is there another (better) solution and where can this addon be downloaded (cause i do not find a working download link). Thanks

Sorting

Hi, Lucene sort hits by relevance as default. Cause i would like to sort them by a special string field and not by relevance i was thinking about dropping the sorting by relevance as default and implement sorting by alphabetic order. Reason that sorting by alpabetic order takes a lot of time. Ma

Re: Sorting with Parallelreader fails

Hi Steve, thanks a lot for your help. I think problem will be that no single terms are stored in that field. So i will take a look and make some furhter tests. Regarding your advice to the "java-user" list, i think it is no problem to send a short vb code to describe the problem. This group is (

Sorting with Parallelreader fails

Hi, i have 3 indexfiles which i access over a parallelreader. When i make a search, everything works fine, butwhen i want to make a search and sorting by a special column i get an error. Here is my code: Schnipp Dim field As SortField = New SortField("Streetname") Dim sortByName As

Re: Part of Index (spezial Field) into Memory

g + ".) " + doc.Get("Nachname").ToString + ", " + doc.Get("Postleitzahl").ToString + " " + doc.Get("Postort").ToString + ", " + doc.Get("Vorwahl").ToString + "-" + doc.Get("Rufnummer").ToString + vbNewLine

Re: Part of Index (spezial Field) into Memory

Damn, of course - sorry & thanks :-)) I will try this tomorrow :-) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Part-of-Index-%28spezial-Field%29-into-Memory-tf1955582.html#a5381183 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com. -

Re: Part of Index (spezial Field) into Memory

but not the name. Somethink i'm doing wrong ... can you help ? Thanks, Neils -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Part-of-Index-%28spezial-Field%29-into-Memory-tf1955582.html#a5378752 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabbl

Re: Part of Index (spezial Field) into Memory

a, ok i understand. So when i loop thru my Databasetable i write two indicies the same time. One for the name index, one for the other field in table. in that way i add documents to the same time in both indicies and so they have to some documentidentifiert right ? Thanks a lot :-)) --

Re: Part of Index (spezial Field) into Memory

documents which results of both indices? Do i have to specifie somewhere that the "ID"field is the relation??? Thanks, Neils :-)) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Part-of-Index-%28spezial-Field%29-into-Memory-tf1955582.html#a5365216 Sent from the Lucene - Java User

Re: Part of Index (spezial Field) into Memory

), Street (on Disk), Phonenumber (on Disk). When now somebody search for name "kos" in the street "teststreet" can you use parallelreader for this and how ? Thank you very much! Neils -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Part-of-Index-%28spezial-Field%29-i

Part of Index (spezial Field) into Memory

Hi, i have a bigger index with around 10 GB. The most used field is the "Name"-Field. So is there way to put a part of the index (maybe a special field) into memory and the rest on disk ? Thanks, Neils -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Part-of-Index-%28spezia