Dear all,
My bad, KMeans is in 10.2 too.
Are there any other clustering algos like DBSCAN (or HDBSCAN) or
Agglomerative planned in future?
Regards,
Arun Kumar K
On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 17:11, Arun Kumar Kalakanti
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Lucene 10.1 introduced "experimental"
alternatives in place to
support it?
Regards,
Arun Kumar K
Examples of the Nested Query: A AND (B OR C) AND D, A AND (!B OR (C and
D)), etc.
Any field(s) represented by A, B, C, and D can be a Vector or Regular Field
too.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 12:33 PM Arun Kumar Kalakanti <
arun.kalaka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’m working with
Hi all,
I’m working with vector queries using KnnVectorQuery, which, as I
understand it, requires a vector field with the target vector for vector
search and a separate filter query for other fields based filters. This
setup has worked well for me so far.
However, I have two queries or use-cases:
handle stuff like product numbers correctly. There
> you can possibly make sure thet "%" survives.
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 20.09.2023 um 22:42 schrieb Amitesh Kumar:
> > Thanks Mikhail!
> >
> > I have tried all other tokenizers from Lucene4.4. In case of
> > Whi
Thanks Mikhail!
I have tried all other tokenizers from Lucene4.4. In case of
WhitespaceTokwnizer, it loses romanizing of special chars like - etc
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 16:39 Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Hello,
> Check the whitespace tokenizer.
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 7:46 PM A
Hi,
I am facing a requirement change to get % sign retained in searches. e.g.
Sample search docs:
1. Number of boys 50
2. My score was 50%
3. 40-50% for pass score
Search query: 50%
Expected results: Doc-2, Doc-3 i.e.
My score was
1. 50%
2. 40-50% for pass score
Actual result: All 3 documents (
Sorry for duplicating the question.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 19:09 Amitesh Kumar wrote:
> I am facing a requirement change to get % sign retained in searches. e.g.
>
> Sample search docs:
> 1. Number of boys 50
> 2. My score was 50%
> 3. 40-50% for pass score
>
> Sear
I am facing a requirement change to get % sign retained in searches. e.g.
Sample search docs:
1. Number of boys 50
2. My score was 50%
3. 40-50% for pass score
Search query: 50%
Expected results: Doc-2, Doc-3 i.e.
My score was
1. 50%
2. 40-50% for pass score
Actual result: All 3 documents (becau
*Warm Regards,*
*Amitesh K*
-- Forwarded message -
From: Amitesh Kumar
Date: Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 7:03 AM
Subject: How to retain % sign against numbers in lucene indexing/ search
To:
Hi Group,
I am facing a requirement change to get % sign retained in searches. e.g
Sample
Hi Team,
Currently we are using Lucene 4.10.4 version. We are getting the below error:
"Document contains at least one immense term in field (whose UTF8 encoding is
longer than the max length 32766), all of which were skipped. Please correct
the analyzer to not produce such terms. The prefix of
Hi Team,
Does Lucene support incremental indexing or we need to index complete
repository for every update in the database?
We have a scenario where millions of records are stored in RDMS and which gets
updated once in a day.
Details: First time we created indexes for millions of records ,if some
Hi All,
I am new to Lucene API and need help with below issues:
* How to achieve near real time search in Lucene v 7.2.0. ? I have seen
examples of having one indexWriter open for entire application life cycle and
invoking indexWriter. getReader() and reader.reopen(). But, these no longer
need to retrieve one field and you can easily convert back
to object.
Regards
Ganesh
On 20-02-2018 08:34, Kumar, Santosh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a requirement to store a Java object with multiple fields into the
Lucene index. Basically, at the ap
Hi,
I have a requirement to store a Java object with multiple fields into the
Lucene index. Basically, at the application startup I run a select query on
entities ( there are 5 of them as of now and may increase in future) and then
create an index for each of these entities (5) i.e. five diffe
2017-12-28 6:35 GMT+01:00 Kumar, Santosh :
>
> While looking up for examples of fuzzy search with Lucene, I came across
> examples that demonstrate Lucene with file system predominantly, so was
> wondering if there are any samples on ‘How to use Lucene with DB’
Hi Trejkaz, Evert, Riccardo,
Thank you for your inputs. We have an application which we plan to migrate to
Cloudfoundry and are yet to make a decision on DataBase with the contenders
being PostgreSQL, MySQL, HANA DB, MongoDB. In the current setup, we use HANA DB
which already has a fuzzy search
Hi,
I’m currently working on project which has the following scenario:
1. I have entities in DB on which I would like to prevent duplicates by same
name or near match, for example, SalesOrder or SlsOrd or SalesOrd etc…are all
considered same. For this, I would like to use fuzzy search and r
Hi, we have 4 solr instances running
we are using solr cloud for indexing hbase table column names.
each column in hbase will end up as a document in solr, which resulted in
over 2 billion documents in solr.
primary goal is to search the column names.
we have 4 shards for the collection, queries a
4297102p4297106.html
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h.
lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
Thank You,
Chaitanya Kumar Ch,
+91 9550837582
hs.get(PATH)));
> IndexSearcher searcher = new IndexSearcher(reader);
> QueryParser parser = new QueryParser( FIELD_NAME, analyzer);
> Query query = parser.parse("+text:iker#");
> ScoreDoc[] docs = searcher.search(query, 2).scoreDocs;
> for( ScoreDoc d : docs ){
> Sy
.ietf.org/html/rfc3986 see section 2.2 so you would have to
> URL encode them
>
> My 2 cents
>
> 2016-09-06 10:20 GMT-04:00 Chaitanya Kumar Ch :
>
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > I have tried that but didn't work.
> > Also please note that *@,# are not part of c
ersyntax.
> html#Escaping%20Special%20Characters
>
> 2016-09-06 10:02 GMT-04:00 Chaitanya Kumar Ch :
>
> > Hi All!
> >
> > I am facing issue while trying to match a fields content with some
> keywords
> > which contains symbols like @,#
> >
> > I have a
Bridge() to the
field but I am not getting results.
Below query is generated If i am remove ignoreFieldBridge()
+(+body:johndaly +body:baby)
Stack overflow link
<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39350676/hibernate-search-lucene-search-text-with-special-characters-like>
--
Thank You,
Chaitanya Kumar Ch,
+91 9550837582
Any suggestions pls?
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Tarun Kumar wrote:
> Hey Michael,
>
> docIds from multiple indices (from multiple machines) need to be
> aggregated, sorted and first few thousand new to be queried. These few
> thousand docs can be distributed among multiple
llions of documents.
>
> Maybe you could make a custom collector, and use doc values, to do your
> own custom aggregation.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Tarun Kumar wrote:
>
>> Thanks for reply Michael! I
be used to load just a few hits, like a
> page worth or ~ 10 documents, per search.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Tarun Kumar wrote:
>
>> I am running lucene 4.6.1. I am trying to get documents correspond
I am running lucene 4.6.1. I am trying to get documents corresponding to
docIds. All threads get stuck (don't get stuck exactly but spend a LOT of
time in) at:
java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
at sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.pread0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.p
I have configured suggester for each Entity in application.
and whenever Entity is being created and updated in application i am
building the suggester manually.
but since i have migrated the Solr from 4.7 to 5.3 i am getting the
java.lang.IllegalStateException:
suggester was not built
Exception
understand.
No plan to turn this off.
* Is running checkIntegrity prior to index merge better than running post
merge?
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Selva Kumar wrote:
> We observe some merge slowness after we migrated from 4.10 to 5.2.
> Is this expected? Any new tunable merge paramet
We observe some merge slowness after we migrated from 4.10 to 5.2.
Is this expected? Any new tunable merge parameters in Lucene 5 ?
-Selva
, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Selva Kumar
> wrote:
> > Mutable, "Immutable" interface of BitSet seems to be defined based on
> > specific things like live docs and documents with DocValue etc. Any plan
> to
> > add general purpose
Mutable, "Immutable" interface of BitSet seems to be defined based on
specific things like live docs and documents with DocValue etc. Any plan to
add general purpose readonly interface to BitSet?
-Selva
.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> Selva Kumar wrote:
> > Subject: Lucene 5 : are FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet thread-safe?
>
>
> Short answer: No.
>
> Longer answer: Reading values and calling methods that does not modify the
> structure
egards,
Assoc Prof Dr Nantha Kumar Subramaniam
*Head of E-Learning*
Open University Malaysia (OUM)
With wrapping collector scenarios, wrapping LeafCollector needs access to
wrapped LeafCollector.
If wrapping LeafCollector has access to LeafReaderContext, it seems one can
use getLeafCollector "getter" anytime to get the wrapped leaf collector.
if collect(int doc) method retrieves LeafCollector
ou have custom filters, I would encourage you to rewrite them
> using the query API instead of Filter.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Selva Kumar
> wrote:
> > With Query/Filter merger, it appears default Filter hashcode() varies by
> > class, not object instance. D
With Query/Filter merger, it appears default Filter hashcode() varies by
class, not object instance. Different object instances could have same
value. Am I missing something?
know if this is possible . you will be my life saver.
--
Thanks and Regards
Suraj kumar
"The most powerful weapon on earth is the human soul on fire.
"
Hi,
While indexing , a norm value is calculated for each field and
injected in the index. This norm value is used as field level boosting
which is also multiplied with other factors like tf-idf and query level
boost which you specify with setBoost. so you see setting boosting is one
of the s
Hi,
If you are comparing two song titles which are usually very short you are
better of using custom set of several features rather than using one of
cosine or levenstein or jaccard. You may use the combination of the
following:
1. cosine sim score
2. Jaccard overlap coeff
3. how many words in th
hi,
While indexing the documents , store the Term Vectors for the content
field. Now for each document you will have an array of terms and their
corresponding frequency in the document. Using the Index Reader you can
retrieve this term vectors. Similarity between two documents can be
computed as
?Hi,
I'm currently migrating from the really old version 3.6 to 4.6. I deleted my
old index and re-indexed everything after migration the whole code base. Now
everything works fine except one thing: My search doesn't return any results as
soon as I add some TermQuery or PhraseQuery to an analy
Hi,
I am using lucene 4.8. I already have an index. I want to use the
Free text suggester feature when a user queries the index. I am not sure
how to start with this. A sample code snippet or a pointer to one would be
really helpful.
Thanks,
Parnab
Have a look at this article if you have not already gone through it.
http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/06/lucenes-near-real-time-search-is-fast.html
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Michael Jennings <
mike.c.jenni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm a bit of a Lucene newb, but a fairl
TF is straight forward, you can simply count the no of occurrences in the
doc by simple string matching. For IDF you need to know total no of docs in
the collection and the no. of docs having the bigram. reader.maxDoc() will
give you the total no of docs in the collection. To calculate the number o
download lucene source code... and check the demo source files that are
shipped with it ... you should find a sample indexing file...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Venkata krishna
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to index millions of files, that's why i am thinking batch wise
> indexing is good.
>
>
/54180991637732354
*Discussion Topics? *
*What is Big Data ?
*Challenges in Big Data
*What is Hadoop ?
*Opportunities in Hadoop / Big Data
Best Regards,
*Kumar Vivek *
M +91-7675824584| si...@soapt.com
www.soapttrainings.com <http://soapttrainings.com/index.php?actio
Just add the lucene jar files in the build path of the project.
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 5:04 PM, sajad naderi wrote:
> hi
> i want run code sample of "lucene in action"book by eclipse
> please tell me how configure eclipse to run those code
>
Thanks Uwe !
For part (1) of my query are there any smart ways ?
Arun
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > With prior warming i find that (a) & (b) take almost same time. I knew
> that
> > only when we reuse the Filter we get its benefits.
> > (c) takes around 30
Hi Guys,
I am using Lucene 4.2.
1> For my use case i am doing a search say name:xyz* and then i have a need
to do a grouping with (from query same as name:xyz* + Filter + GroupSort)
may be in same/different thread.
>From my understanding the second internal search will be faster but i have
good
Hi,
Thanks Robert ! This info is exactly what i need.
Just for getting myself clear.
If the field is a DocValue field the FieldCacheTermsFilter will use the
existing DocValues Field. For Normal Fields the filter will create a
DocValues for that field using FieldCache.
Arun
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013
Hi Guys,
I was trying to better the filtering mechanism for my use case.
When i use the existing filters like FieldCacheTermsFilter, TermsFilter i
see that the first filtering take up enough time may be for building the
FieldCache. Subsequent filters are fast enough.
Currently, I am using CachingW
inefficient for random lookup. You schould do a bibary
> search to find the right leaf. ComposuteReader and ReaderUtil have utility
> methods to do this.
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> Arun Kumar K schrieb:
> >Hi Guys,
> >
> >I am trying to get hands on Lucene 4.2 Doc Va
Hi Guys,
I am trying to get hands on Lucene 4.2 Doc Values (RAM Based Which is by
default).
I have a 1GB index with 54 documents.
When retrieving the DocVals for matched docs i am able to retrieve vals
only upto some limit around 45000 docvals only.
for (AtomicReaderContext context : reader
Adrein,
Thanks for spending time to explain me the things clearly. I have got the
things correctly now.
Thanks,
Arun
On 29-May-2013, at 2:13 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Arun Kumar K wrote:
>> Thanks for clarifying the things.
>> I have some d
i right here?
Thanks,
Arun
On 28-May-2013, at 8:31 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Arun Kumar K wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>
> Hi,
>
>> I have been trying to understand DocValues and get some hands on and have
>> observed few things.
&g
Hi Guys,
I have been trying to understand DocValues and get some hands on and have
observed few things.
I have added LongDocValuesField to the documents like:
doc.add(new LongDocValuesField("id",1));
1> In 4.0 i saw that there are two versions for docvalues,
RAM Resident(using Sources.getSO
gt; -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Arun Kumar K [mailto:arunk...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:41 PM
> > To: java-
Hi Guys,
I am using following queries:
1>WildCardQuery
2>BooleanQuery having a WildCardQuery and TermQuery.
WildCardQuery is field:* or say field:ab*
>From Lucene FAQs and earlier discussions about TooManyClausesException i
see that WildCardQuery gets expanded before doing search.
For that i was
ram you are setting on the
> index writer config?
>
> also how many threads are you using for indexing?
>
> simon
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Arun Kumar K wrote:
> > Hi Adrien,
> >
> > I have seen memory usage using linux command top for RES memory &
M, Adrien Grand wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Arun Kumar K wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
>
> Hi,
>
> > I have been finding out the heap space requirement for indexing and
> > searching with 3.0.2 vs 4.1 (with BlockPostings Format).
> >
> > I have a 2GB inde
Hi Guys,
I have been finding out the heap space requirement for indexing and
searching with 3.0.2 vs 4.1 (with BlockPostings Format).
I have a 2GB index with 1 million docs with around 42 fields with 40 fields
being random strings.
I have seen that memory for search has reduced by 5X with 4.1 (w
ngeQuery(20130101, 20130131)? Another approach for improving
> prefix queries is indexing additional terms: If you are always searching
> for a 2-char prefix for "ab*", then simply index an additional term in a
> separate field with 2 chars (e.g., "ab") in your documents
dler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arun Kumar K [mailto:arunk...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 10:38 AM
> > To: java-user
> > Subject: Wi
Hi Guys,
I have been testing the search time improvement in Lucene 4.0 from Lucene
3.0.2 version for Wildcard Queries (with atleast say 2 chars Eg.ar*).
For a 2GB size index with 400 docs, the following observations were
made:
Around 3X improvement with and without STRING sort on a sortable
e sure how to use it and have found scant references to it
Any help is appreciated
Thanks
kumar
Hi Rajashekhar,
yet it is possible . You can form a Boolean Query which will match the
documents as per your required conditions . Then you can delete by the
respective document ids by instantiating a indexReader.
You can refer to Book Lucene in Action 2nd Edition for more details .
Thanks,
Parn
Hi Deepak ,
Lucene already has multi-language support . For any language you just need
to write the custom Analyzer for that language .While indexing you can
configure the indexer to use the custom analyzer as and when needed .
During searching also, the same applies .You just need to provide the
t
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 8:02 AM, parnab kumar
> wrote:
> > Hi Erick,
> > Can you please share your thoughts on the following :
> > Since lucene by default does vector space scoring , the
> > weight component for a term from
Hi,
Use IndexReader instead . You can loop through the index and
read one document at a time .
Thanks,
Parnab
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Selvakumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Lucene and I reading the docs on Lucene.
>
>
> I read through the Lucene Index File Format, so to e
are
> indistinguishable.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:23 PM, parnab kumar
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> >I have an algorithm by which i measure the importance of a
> term
> > in a document . While indexing i want to store weig
We have recently moved to 3.6 from lucene 2.2 and have seen that the way
tokens get indexed are not the same.
Although we are open to reindexing the data which was initially indexed
with 2.2, I would like to know if there is a way I can avoid indexing?
I am using IndexUpgrader tool to update the
Why don't you store keywords related data in keywords field which can be
analyzed and other field in as it is now.
So all fields for which keywords is needed, move it to keywords section
-v
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 27,
Hello All,
I have a requirement of using different analyzer per document. How can
we do this?
My analyzer would be locale specific.
I have a file with 10 lines, each with different language. Document
would be one line and I want analyzer to be changed based on the locale
of the line. Is this po
Hope you have write permission on this index file
Vinaya
-Original Message-
From: Michael Südkamp [mailto:michael.suedk...@docware.de]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 3:16 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [OT] editing index with Luke question
Hi,
I know the Luke tool for
is there a lucene Bangalore chapter ?
-Vinaya
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
Hello Cheta,
Check this site : http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/09/nutch-solr/
Vinaya
-Original Message-
From: Marlen [mailto:zmach...@facinf.uho.edu.cu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 7:19 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: need help
I need to create a search engi
rger of x or y. But this is not happening. Please help how should I
proceed to implement this?
Any help or suggestion will be appreciated!!!
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjit Kumar
===
Private, Confidentia
rger of x or y. But this is not happening. Please help how should I
proceed to implement this?
Any help or suggestion will be appreciated!!!
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjit Kumar
===
Private, Confidentia
.net I
need to use MultiFieldQueryParser to get correct result(document). Then Parser
stripping off # but do not dot(.) so query became c AND .net
Also, I have made changes for c#.net, vb.net, .net all these work properly with
MultiFieldQueryParser except c#
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjit K
MultiFieldQueryParser but it also do the same.
Any help or suggestion will be appreciated!!!
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjit Kumar
===
Private, Confidential and Privileged. This e-mail and any files
Hi,
I am creating index with help of StandardAnalyzer for *.docx file it's fine.
But at the time of searching it do not gives result for these *.docx file.
any help or suggestion will be appreciated!!!
Thanks & Regards,
Ran
Hello All,
I am looking for Japanese/Chinese stemmer . Does this exists ? do we
require it ?
(Analyser are already present in lucene)
I did a goggle and did not find any conclusive answer.
Thanks in advance
vinaya
-
To unsub
Hello Ranjit,
Can you use the latest luke tool ? It has analyzer section which helps
in deciding which analyzer to use based on the input.
Hope this helps
-vinaya
On Monday 14 March 2011 07:18 PM, Ranjit Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I am creating index using Lucene 3.0.3 *StandardAnalyzer*.
when
existing analyzer will resolve this issue?
Any suggestion will be appreciated!!!
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjit Kumar
Associate Software Engineer
[cid:image002.jpg@01CB7089.C0069B40]
US: +1 408.540.0001
UK: +44 208.099.1660
India: +91 124.474.8100 | +91 124.410.1350
FAX: +1 408.51
Hello Stephane,
I think a better way is to have resource file with different language
and store pointer in the index to get to correct resource file (
Something like I18N and L10N approach). Store the internationalised
string in index and all related localised string in resource file .
Thi
eanClause.Occur.MUST};
Query query = MultiFieldQueryParser.parse(Version.LUCENE_CURRENT, queree,
fields, flags, analyzer);
TopDocs docs = searcher.search(query, null, n);
System.out.println("Total document matched: "+docs.totalHits);
string?
If not? Please suggest me how to get correct hit(document).
Your suggestion will be very helpful for me.
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjit Kumar
===
Private, Confidential and Privileged. This e-
suggest me feasible solution.
how could get correct document in case of multiple Boolean query in search
criteria?
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjit Kumar
===
Private, Confidential and Privileged. This e-mail and
with this condition.
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjit Kumar
===
Private, Confidential and Privileged. This e-mail and any files and
attachments transmitted with it are confidential and/or privileged. They are
s);
It gives incorrect result or document. In case of using SpanQuery and
SpanNearQuery it gives same result.
Is this a bug?
Can you give some hint about luke?
Any suggestion will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjit Kumar
Associate Software Engineer
[cid:image002.jpg@01CB7089.C006
l Server". It gives result for (sql.
server) which is not correct.
I am using StandardAnalyzer on both side while creating index or searching on
files. While creating index Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED is used.
Please, give your suggestion !!!
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjit Kumar
Associate S
Hi;
While I am creating index using lucene-core-3.0.3.jar it takes
more time as compare too lucene-core-3.0.2.jar .
Please give your suggestion.
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjit K
I think we should be using lucene with snowball jar's which means one
index for all languages (ofcourse size of index is always a matter of
concerns).
Hope this helps.
-vinaya
On Tuesday 18 January 2011 11:23 PM, Clemens Wyss wrote:
What is the "best practice" to support multiple languages, i
totalFreq = (Integer)
lsta1.get(lsta.indexOf(docId));
}
w.write(contId+"\t"+ID+"\t"+totalFreq+"\t"+reader.document(docId).get("path")+"\n");
}
Thanks & Regards,
Ran
String path = document.get("path");
System.out.println("path>>" + path);
totalFreq = termDocs.freq();
System.out.println("totalFreq >>" + totalFreq)
Hello All,
is there any ui framework that exists for lucene framework.
i am not looking for luke kind of tool.
But more like application ready to use.
"Add a config file and ui is ready to use for adding data and also
search data".
Thanks and Regards
Vinaya
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
