o get some benefit from CachingWrapperFilter.
And ignore my entire diatribe about whether you can restrict
your wildcards to 3 or more characters, that approach doesn't
fit your problem space at all
Best
Erick
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:39 AM, d-fader wrote:
Well, it worked. I indexed
his topic, see the following for that discussion:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/65a13a1dbd7035ae/i_just_don_t_get_wildcards_at_all#65a13a1dbd7035ae
Best
Erick
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:05 AM, d-fader wrote:
Hi,
I've actually posted this message in de dev mailing list earlier,
because I though my
alysis/ngram/EdgeNGramTokenFilter.html
The classes are available in the contrib/analyzer module.
You might want to boost edges a bit more than inner parts, start
trying out with something like 3-5 grams.
Be aware, this will produce a rather large index.
karl
13 feb 2009 kl. 10.43 skr
;t understand how Google manages to do this :)
Jori.
Karl Wettin wrote:
Hi again Jori,
did you try N-grams as suggested in the reply on -dev?
karl
13 feb 2009 kl. 09.05 skrev d-fader:
Hi,
I've actually posted this message in de dev mailing list earlier,
because I though my
Hi,
I've actually posted this message in de dev mailing list earlier,
because I though my 'issue' is a limitation of the functionality of
Lucene, but they redirected me to this mailinglist, so I hope one of you
guys can help me out :)
Maybe the 'issue' I'm addressing now is discussed thouroughly