our random string generation.
>
> are you indexing random data?
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:46 AM, arun k wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please find the snapshots here.
> > http://picpaste.com/Lucene3.0.2-G00Z5FfX.png
> > http://picpaste.com/Lucene4.1-LsxpcQk
emoved it. Can you place it somewhere on the web (e.g. pastebin,…)?
>
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> -
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>
> <http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
&g
Adrein,
Please find the attached profilers report.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:08 AM, arun k wrote:
> > Adrein,
> >
> > I have created an index of size 370M of 1 million docs of 40 fields of 40
> > chars and d
Adrein,
I have created an index of size 370M of 1 million docs of 40 fields of 40
chars and did the profiling.
I see that the indexing and in particular the addDocument &
ConcurrentMergeScheduler in 4.1 takes double the time compared to 3.0.2.
Looks like CompressionStoredFieldsFormat is of little
g 2 seconds rather than 1? What
> happens if ... as above.
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:20 PM, arun k wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > After hearing a lot about the CompressingStoredFieldsFormat i have done
> > some tests to find wh
